» Articles » PMID: 25882030

Readability of Patient Discharge Instructions with and Without the Use of Electronically Available Disease-specific Templates

Overview
Date 2015 Apr 18
PMID 25882030
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Low health literacy is common, leading to patient vulnerability during hospital discharge, when patients rely on written health instructions. We aimed to examine the impact of the use of electronic, patient-friendly, templated discharge instructions on the readability of discharge instructions provided to patients at discharge.

Materials And Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 233 patients discharged from a large tertiary care hospital to their homes following the implementation of a web-based "discharge module," which included the optional use of diagnosis-specific templated discharge instructions. We compared the readability of discharge instructions, as measured by the Flesch Reading Ease Level test (FREL, on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating greater readability) and the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level test (FKGL, measured in grade levels), between discharges that used templated instructions (with or without modification) versus discharges that used clinician-generated instructions (with or without available templated instructions for the specific discharge diagnosis).

Results: Templated discharge instructions were provided to patients in 45% of discharges. Of the 55% of patients that received clinician-generated discharge instructions, the majority (78.1%) had no available templated instruction for the specific discharge diagnosis. Templated discharge instructions had higher FREL scores (71 vs. 57, P < .001) and lower FKGL scores (5.6 vs. 7.6, P < .001), compared to clinician-generated discharge instructions.

Discussion: The use of electronically available templated discharge instructions was associated with better readability (a higher FREL score and a lower FKGL score) than the use of clinician-generated discharge instructions. The main reason for clinicians to create discharge instructions was the lack of available templates for the patient's specific discharge diagnosis.

Conclusions: Use of electronically available templated discharge instructions may be a viable option to improve the readability of written material provided to patients at discharge, although the library of available templates requires expansion.

Citing Articles

Improving patient understanding on discharge from the short stay unit: an integrated human factors and quality improvement approach.

Cook J, Fioratou E, Davey P, Urquhart L BMJ Open Qual. 2022; 11(3).

PMID: 35998981 PMC: 9403153. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001810.


Efficacy of Digital Health Tools for a Pediatric Patient Registry: Semistructured Interviews and Interface Usability Testing With Parents and Clinicians.

Doyle S, Pavlos R, Carlson S, Barton K, Bhuiyan M, Boeing B JMIR Form Res. 2022; 6(1):e29889.

PMID: 35037889 PMC: 8804961. DOI: 10.2196/29889.


Improving Discharge Instructions Following a Concussion Diagnosis in the Pediatric Emergency Department: A Pre-post Intervention Study.

Yengo-Kahn A, Hibshman N, Bezzerides M, Feldman M, Vukovic A, Mummareddy N Pediatr Qual Saf. 2021; 6(5):e456.

PMID: 34476308 PMC: 8389964. DOI: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000456.


A Scoping Review on How to Make Hospitals health Literate Healthcare Organizations.

Zanobini P, Lorini C, Baldasseroni A, Dellisanti C, Bonaccorsi G Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(3).

PMID: 32041282 PMC: 7037285. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17031036.


Testing a Photo Story Intervention in Paper Versus Electronic Tablet Format Compared to a Traditional Brochure Among Older Adults in Germany: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Tan S, Whittal A, Lippke S JMIR Aging. 2019; 1(2):e12145.

PMID: 31518254 PMC: 6715415. DOI: 10.2196/12145.


References
1.
Murphy P, CHESSON A, Walker L, Arnold C, Chesson L . Comparing the effectiveness of video and written material for improving knowledge among sleep disorders clinic patients with limited literacy skills. South Med J. 2000; 93(3):297-304. View

2.
Baker D, Parker R, Williams M, Clark W . Health literacy and the risk of hospital admission. J Gen Intern Med. 1998; 13(12):791-8. PMC: 1497036. DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00242.x. View

3.
Kalichman S, Ramachandran B, Catz S . Adherence to combination antiretroviral therapies in HIV patients of low health literacy. J Gen Intern Med. 1999; 14(5):267-73. PMC: 1496573. DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00334.x. View

4.
Pignone M, DeWalt D, Sheridan S, Berkman N, Lohr K . Interventions to improve health outcomes for patients with low literacy. A systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2005; 20(2):185-92. PMC: 1490066. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40208.x. View

5.
Friedman D, Hoffman-Goetz L . A systematic review of readability and comprehension instruments used for print and web-based cancer information. Health Educ Behav. 2006; 33(3):352-73. DOI: 10.1177/1090198105277329. View