Readability of Patient Discharge Instructions with and Without the Use of Electronically Available Disease-specific Templates
Overview
Affiliations
Objective: Low health literacy is common, leading to patient vulnerability during hospital discharge, when patients rely on written health instructions. We aimed to examine the impact of the use of electronic, patient-friendly, templated discharge instructions on the readability of discharge instructions provided to patients at discharge.
Materials And Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 233 patients discharged from a large tertiary care hospital to their homes following the implementation of a web-based "discharge module," which included the optional use of diagnosis-specific templated discharge instructions. We compared the readability of discharge instructions, as measured by the Flesch Reading Ease Level test (FREL, on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating greater readability) and the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level test (FKGL, measured in grade levels), between discharges that used templated instructions (with or without modification) versus discharges that used clinician-generated instructions (with or without available templated instructions for the specific discharge diagnosis).
Results: Templated discharge instructions were provided to patients in 45% of discharges. Of the 55% of patients that received clinician-generated discharge instructions, the majority (78.1%) had no available templated instruction for the specific discharge diagnosis. Templated discharge instructions had higher FREL scores (71 vs. 57, P < .001) and lower FKGL scores (5.6 vs. 7.6, P < .001), compared to clinician-generated discharge instructions.
Discussion: The use of electronically available templated discharge instructions was associated with better readability (a higher FREL score and a lower FKGL score) than the use of clinician-generated discharge instructions. The main reason for clinicians to create discharge instructions was the lack of available templates for the patient's specific discharge diagnosis.
Conclusions: Use of electronically available templated discharge instructions may be a viable option to improve the readability of written material provided to patients at discharge, although the library of available templates requires expansion.
Cook J, Fioratou E, Davey P, Urquhart L BMJ Open Qual. 2022; 11(3).
PMID: 35998981 PMC: 9403153. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001810.
Doyle S, Pavlos R, Carlson S, Barton K, Bhuiyan M, Boeing B JMIR Form Res. 2022; 6(1):e29889.
PMID: 35037889 PMC: 8804961. DOI: 10.2196/29889.
Yengo-Kahn A, Hibshman N, Bezzerides M, Feldman M, Vukovic A, Mummareddy N Pediatr Qual Saf. 2021; 6(5):e456.
PMID: 34476308 PMC: 8389964. DOI: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000456.
A Scoping Review on How to Make Hospitals health Literate Healthcare Organizations.
Zanobini P, Lorini C, Baldasseroni A, Dellisanti C, Bonaccorsi G Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(3).
PMID: 32041282 PMC: 7037285. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17031036.
Tan S, Whittal A, Lippke S JMIR Aging. 2019; 1(2):e12145.
PMID: 31518254 PMC: 6715415. DOI: 10.2196/12145.