» Articles » PMID: 25875821

Metamizole-associated Adverse Events: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 Apr 16
PMID 25875821
Citations 44
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Metamizole is used to treat pain in many parts of the world. Information on the safety profile of metamizole is scarce; no conclusive summary of the literature exists.

Objective: To determine whether metamizole is clinically safe compared to placebo and other analgesics.

Methods: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and several clinical trial registries. We screened the reference lists of included trials and previous systematic reviews. We included randomized controlled trials that compared the effects of metamizole, administered to adults in any form and for any indication, to other analgesics or to placebo. Two authors extracted data regarding trial design and size, indications for pain medication, patient characteristics, treatment regimens, and methodological characteristics. Adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and dropouts were assessed. We conducted separate meta-analyses for each metamizole comparator, using standard inverse-variance random effects meta-analysis to pool the estimates across trials, reported as risk ratios (RRs). We calculated the DerSimonian and Laird variance estimate T2 to measure heterogeneity between trials. The pre-specified primary end point was any AE during the trial period.

Results: Of the 696 potentially eligible trials, 79 trials including almost 4000 patients with short-term metamizole use of less than two weeks met our inclusion criteria. Fewer AEs were reported for metamizole compared to opioids, RR = 0.79 (confidence interval 0.79 to 0.96). We found no differences between metamizole and placebo, paracetamol and NSAIDs. Only a few SAEs were reported, with no difference between metamizole and other analgesics. No agranulocytosis or deaths were reported. Our results were limited by the mediocre overall quality of the reports.

Conclusion: For short-term use in the hospital setting, metamizole seems to be a safe choice when compared to other widely used analgesics. High-quality, adequately sized trials assessing the intermediate- and long-term safety of metamizole are needed.

Citing Articles

Pharmacological Pain Treatment in Older Persons.

Pickering G, Kotlinska-Lemieszek A, Krcevski Skvarc N, OMahony D, Monacelli F, Knaggs R Drugs Aging. 2024; 41(12):959-976.

PMID: 39465454 PMC: 11634925. DOI: 10.1007/s40266-024-01151-8.


Metamizole in the Management of Musculoskeletal Disorders: Current Concept Review.

Jeyaraman N, Migliorini F, Murugan S, Ramasubramanian S, Balaji S, Maffulli N J Clin Med. 2024; 13(16).

PMID: 39200936 PMC: 11355082. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13164794.


Adverse effects of metamizole on heart, lung, liver, kidney, and stomach in rats.

Ciftel S, Suleyman B, Mammadov R, Coskun R, Coban T, Mokhtare B BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2024; 25(1):55.

PMID: 39175070 PMC: 11342507. DOI: 10.1186/s40360-024-00780-4.


The Adequacy of Anesthesia Guidance for Vitreoretinal Surgeries with Preemptive Paracetamol/Metamizole.

Stasiowski M, Lyssek-Boron A, Zmarzly N, Marczak K, Grabarek B Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024; 17(1).

PMID: 38256962 PMC: 10819548. DOI: 10.3390/ph17010129.


Analysis of Pain Management after Anatomic VATS Resection in Austrian Thoracic Surgery Units.

Ponholzer F, Schweiger T, Ghanim B, Maier H, Hutter J, Tomaselli F J Clin Med. 2024; 13(1).

PMID: 38202087 PMC: 10779807. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13010080.


References
1.
Torres L, COLLADO F, Almarcha J, Huertas V, De Antonio P, Rodriguez M . [Treatment of postoperative pain with intravenous PCA system. Comparison with morphine, metamizole, and buprenorphine]. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 1993; 40(4):181-4. View

2.
Heimpel H . Drug-induced agranulocytosis. Med Toxicol Adverse Drug Exp. 1988; 3(6):449-62. DOI: 10.1007/BF03259896. View

3.
Mehta S . A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study of dipyrone and aspirin in post-operative orthopaedic patients. J Int Med Res. 1986; 14(2):63-6. DOI: 10.1177/030006058601400202. View

4.
Flather M, Farkouh M, Pogue J, Yusuf S . Strengths and limitations of meta-analysis: larger studies may be more reliable. Control Clin Trials. 1997; 18(6):568-79; discussion 661-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0197-2456(97)00024-x. View

5.
Hedenmalm K, Spigset O . Agranulocytosis and other blood dyscrasias associated with dipyrone (metamizole). Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2002; 58(4):265-74. DOI: 10.1007/s00228-002-0465-2. View