» Articles » PMID: 25862639

Geoengineering As Collective Experimentation

Overview
Journal Sci Eng Ethics
Date 2015 Apr 12
PMID 25862639
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Geoengineering is defined as the 'deliberate and large-scale intervention in the Earth's climatic system with the aim of reducing global warming'. The technological proposals for doing this are highly speculative. Research is at an early stage, but there is a strong consensus that technologies would, if realisable, have profound and surprising ramifications. Geoengineering would seem to be an archetype of technology as social experiment, blurring lines that separate research from deployment and scientific knowledge from technological artefacts. Looking into the experimental systems of geoengineering, we can see the negotiation of what is known and unknown. The paper argues that, in renegotiating such systems, we can approach a new mode of governance-collective experimentation. This has important ramifications not just for how we imagine future geoengineering technologies, but also for how we govern geoengineering experiments currently under discussion.

Citing Articles

Governing beyond the project: Refocusing innovation governance in emerging science and technology funding.

Smith R, Schafer S, Bernstein M Soc Stud Sci. 2023; 54(3):377-404.

PMID: 37974362 PMC: 11118785. DOI: 10.1177/03063127231205043.


The politics of scaling.

Pfotenhauer S, Laurent B, Papageorgiou K, Stilgoe A Soc Stud Sci. 2021; 52(1):3-34.

PMID: 34625011 PMC: 8771885. DOI: 10.1177/03063127211048945.


Integrating political and technological uncertainty into robust climate policy.

Thiele L Clim Change. 2020; 163(1):521-538.

PMID: 32921852 PMC: 7473827. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-020-02853-9.


Solar geoengineering to reduce climate change: a review of governance proposals.

Reynolds J Proc Math Phys Eng Sci. 2019; 475(2229):20190255.

PMID: 31611719 PMC: 6784395. DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2019.0255.


Constructing future scenarios as a tool to foster responsible research and innovation among future synthetic biologists.

Betten A, Rerimassie V, Broerse J, Stemerding D, Kupper F Life Sci Soc Policy. 2018; 14(1):21.

PMID: 30198056 PMC: 6129456. DOI: 10.1186/s40504-018-0082-1.


References
1.
Dykema J, Keith D, Anderson J, Weisenstein D . Stratospheric controlled perturbation experiment: a small-scale experiment to improve understanding of the risks of solar geoengineering. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2014; 372(2031). PMC: 4240955. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2014.0059. View

2.
Keith D, Duren R, MacMartin D . Field experiments on solar geoengineering: report of a workshop exploring a representative research portfolio. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2014; 372(2031). PMC: 4240958. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2014.0175. View

3.
Marchant G, Pope L . The problems with forbidding science. Sci Eng Ethics. 2009; 15(3):375-94. PMC: 7088679. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-009-9130-9. View

4.
Schiaffonati V . Stretching the Traditional Notion of Experiment in Computing: Explorative Experiments. Sci Eng Ethics. 2015; 22(3):647-65. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-015-9655-z. View

5.
Guston D . Understanding 'anticipatory governance'. Soc Stud Sci. 2014; 44(2):218-42. DOI: 10.1177/0306312713508669. View