» Articles » PMID: 25862581

Wide Inter-institutional Variation in Performance of a Molecular Classifier for Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules

Overview
Journal Ann Surg Oncol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2015 Apr 12
PMID 25862581
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The Afirma gene expression classifier (GEC) is used to assess malignancy risk in indeterminate thyroid nodules (ITNs) classified as Bethesda category III/IV. Our objective was to analyze GEC performance at two institutions with high thyroid cytopathology volumes but differing prevalence of malignancy.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of all ITNs evaluated with the GEC at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK; n = 94) and Mount Sinai Beth Israel (MSBI; n = 71). These institutions have differing prevalences of malignancy in ITNs: 30-38 % (MSK) and 10-19 % (MSBI). Surgical pathology was correlated with GEC findings for each matched nodule. Performance characteristics were estimated using Bayes Theorem.

Results: Patient and nodule characteristics were similar at MSK and MSBI. The GEC-benign call rates were 38.3 % (MSK) and 52.1 % (MSBI). Of the GEC-benign nodules, 8.3 % (MSK) and 13.5 % (MSBI) were treated surgically. Surgical pathology indicated that all of GEC-benign nodules were benign. Of the GEC-suspicious nodules, 60.0 % (MSK) and 61.7 % (MSBI) underwent surgery. Positive predictive values (PPVs) for GEC-suspicious results were 57.1 % (95 % CI 41.0-72.3) at MSK and 14.3 % (95 % CI 0.2-30.2) at MSBI. The estimated negative predictive values (NPVs) were 86-92 % at MSK and 95-98 % at MSBI.

Conclusions: There were wide variations in the Afirma GEC-benign call rate, PPV, and NPV between MSBI (a comprehensive health system) and MSK (a tertiary referral cancer center), which had differing rates of malignancy in ITNs. The GEC could not routinely alter management in either institution. We believe that this assay would be expected to be most informative in practice settings where the prevalence of malignancy is 15-21 %, such that NPV >95 % and PPV >25 % would be anticipated. Knowing the prevalence of malignancy in ITNs at a particular institution is critical for reliable interpretation of GEC results.

Citing Articles

Small Multi-Gene DNA Panel Can Aid in Reducing the Surgical Resection Rate and Predicting the Malignancy Risk of Thyroid Nodules.

Oh M, Choi H, Jang J, Son H, Park S, Song M Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2024; 39(5):777-792.

PMID: 39397516 PMC: 11525692. DOI: 10.3803/EnM.2024.2034.


Diagnostic accuracy of Afirma gene expression classifier, Afirma gene sequencing classifier, ThyroSeq v2 and ThyroSeq v3 for indeterminate (Bethesda III and IV) thyroid nodules: a meta-analysis.

Vardarli I, Tan S, Gorges R, Kramer B, Herrmann K, Brochhausen C Endocr Connect. 2024; 13(7).

PMID: 38771544 PMC: 11227067. DOI: 10.1530/EC-24-0170.


Diagnostic Performance of Afirma and Interpace Diagnostics Genetic Testing in Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Single Center Study.

Kandil E, Metz T, Issa P, Aboueisha M, Omar M, Attia A Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(7).

PMID: 37046759 PMC: 10093254. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15072098.


Expression Indicates Lymph Node Metastasis and Presence of Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts in Papillary Thyroid Cancer.

Dadafarin S, Rodriguez T, Carnazza M, Tiwari R, Moscatello A, Geliebter J Cells. 2022; 11(19).

PMID: 36231143 PMC: 9562881. DOI: 10.3390/cells11193181.


Assessing Bias and Limitations of Clinical Validation Studies of Molecular Diagnostic Tests for Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

DiGennaro C, Vahdatzad V, Jalali M, Toumi A, Watson T, Gazelle G Thyroid. 2022; 32(10):1144-1157.

PMID: 35999710 PMC: 9595633. DOI: 10.1089/thy.2022.0269.


References
1.
Nikiforov Y, Carty S, Chiosea S, Coyne C, Duvvuri U, Ferris R . Highly accurate diagnosis of cancer in thyroid nodules with follicular neoplasm/suspicious for a follicular neoplasm cytology by ThyroSeq v2 next-generation sequencing assay. Cancer. 2014; 120(23):3627-34. PMC: 7737376. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29038. View

2.
McIver B . Evaluation of the thyroid nodule. Oral Oncol. 2013; 49(7):645-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2013.03.435. View

3.
Cibas E, Ali S . The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Thyroid. 2009; 19(11):1159-65. DOI: 10.1089/thy.2009.0274. View

4.
Alexander E, Kennedy G, Baloch Z, Cibas E, Chudova D, Diggans J . Preoperative diagnosis of benign thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367(8):705-15. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1203208. View

5.
Ho A, Sarti E, Jain K, Wang H, Nixon I, Shaha A . Malignancy rate in thyroid nodules classified as Bethesda category III (AUS/FLUS). Thyroid. 2013; 24(5):832-9. PMC: 4948206. DOI: 10.1089/thy.2013.0317. View