» Articles » PMID: 25859857

Could the Extent of Lymphadenectomy Be Modified by Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Cervical Cancer? A Large-scale Retrospective Study

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 Apr 11
PMID 25859857
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) on topographical distribution patterns of lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer was unknown.

Methods: Patients with FIGO stage IB1-IIB who underwent radical surgery with or without NACT were enrolled (3527 patients). A matched-case comparison design was used to compare the effects of NACT on lymph node metastasis.

Results: We analyzed groups of 167 and 140 patients who were diagnosed with lymph node metastasis in the matched primary surgery group and NACT group, respectively, and no significant difference was observed (p = 0.081). The incidence of lymph node metastasis was significantly decreased in the NACT-responsive group compared to the non-responsive group (18.4% vs. 38.6%, P<0.001). The metastatic rates for every lymph node group also declined in the NACT-responsive group except for the deep inguinal and the para-aortic lymph node groups. Clinical response, deep stromal, parametrial and lymph vascular invasions were independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis in the NACT group. Furthermore, deep stromal invasion and lymph vascular invasion, but not the response to NACT, were independently associated with upper LNM. The number of lymph nodes involved, response to NACT, tumor histology and a positive vaginal margin were independent prognostic factors affecting DFS or OS rates in node-positive patients treated with NACT plus radical surgery.

Conclusion: The frequency and topographic distribution of LNM are not modified by NACT, and clinical non-responders showed more involved LNs. A systemic and extensive lymphadenectomy should be performed in patients treated with NACT plus surgery regardless of the response to NACT.

Citing Articles

Early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy can help predict long-term survival in patients with cervical cancer.

Li X, Huang K, Zhang Q, Shen J, Zhou H, Yang R Oncotarget. 2016; 7(52):87485-87495.

PMID: 27557523 PMC: 5350004. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.11460.

References
1.
Lee J, Kim Y, Kim M, Kim K, Chung H, Park N . Treatment of stage IB2, IIA bulky cervical cancer: a single-institution experience of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy and primary radical hysterectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010; 284(2):477-82. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-010-1685-9. View

2.
Kim H, Kim J, Chung H, Kim H, Kim Y, Kim J . Significance of numbers of metastatic and removed lymph nodes in FIGO stage IB1 to IIA cervical cancer: Primary surgical treatment versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery. Gynecol Oncol. 2011; 121(3):551-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.01.024. View

3.
Huang H, Liu J, Li Y, Wan T, Feng Y, Li Z . Metastasis to deep obturator and para-aortic lymph nodes in 649 patients with cervical carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011; 37(11):978-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.08.128. View

4.
Hu T, Li S, Chen Y, Shen J, Li X, Huang K . Matched-case comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with FIGO stage IB1-IIB cervical cancer to establish selection criteria. Eur J Cancer. 2012; 48(15):2353-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.03.015. View

5.
Ryu H, Chang K, Yang H, Kim M, Kwon H, Oh K . High cyclooxygenase-2 expression in stage IB cervical cancer with lymph node metastasis or parametrial invasion. Gynecol Oncol. 2000; 76(3):320-5. DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1999.5690. View