» Articles » PMID: 25859233

Intra-individual Variability and Continuity of Action and Perception Measures in Infants

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2015 Apr 11
PMID 25859233
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The development of action and perception, and their relation in infancy is a central research area in socio-cognitive sciences. In this Perspective Article, we focus on the developmental variability and continuity of action and perception. At group level, these skills have been shown to consistently improve with age. We would like to raise awareness for the issue that, at individual level, development might be subject to more variable changes. We present data from a longitudinal study on the perception and production of contralateral reaching skills of infants aged 7, 8, 9, and 12 months. Our findings suggest that individual development does not increase linearly for action or for perception, but instead changes dynamically. These non-continuous changes substantially affect the relation between action and perception at each measuring point and the respective direction of causality. This suggests that research on the development of action and perception and their interrelations needs to take into account individual variability and continuity more progressively.

Citing Articles

Two-step actions in infancy-the TWAIN model.

Gottwald J, Gredeback G, Lindskog M Exp Brain Res. 2019; 237(10):2495-2503.

PMID: 31324927 PMC: 6751224. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05604-0.


The Development of Bimanual Coordination Across Toddlerhood.

Brakke K, Pacheco M Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019; 84(2):7-147.

PMID: 31162687 PMC: 7054025. DOI: 10.1111/mono.12405.


Action perception in infancy: the plasticity of 7-month-olds' attention to grasping actions.

Daum M, Wronski C, Harms A, Gredeback G Exp Brain Res. 2016; 234(9):2465-78.

PMID: 27093869 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4651-3.

References
1.
van der Maas H, Molenaar P . Stagewise cognitive development: an application of catastrophe theory. Psychol Rev. 1992; 99(3):395-417. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.99.3.395. View

2.
Gergely G, Nadasdy Z, Csibra G, Biro S . Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition. 1995; 56(2):165-93. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00661-h. View

3.
Reddy V, Markova G, Wallot S . Anticipatory adjustments to being picked up in infancy. PLoS One. 2013; 8(6):e65289. PMC: 3688725. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065289. View

4.
Heath R, Kelly A, Longstaff M . Detecting nonlinearity in psychological data: techniques and applications. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2000; 32(2):280-9. DOI: 10.3758/bf03207796. View

5.
Giese M, Dijkstra T, Schoner G, Gielen C . Identification of the nonlinear state-space dynamics of the action-perception cycle for visually induced postural sway. Biol Cybern. 1996; 74(5):427-37. DOI: 10.1007/BF00206709. View