» Articles » PMID: 25858447

Native Language Experience Shapes Neural Basis of Addressed and Assembled Phonologies

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2015 Apr 11
PMID 25858447
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous studies have suggested differential engagement of addressed and assembled phonologies in reading Chinese and alphabetic languages (e.g., English) and the modulatory role of native language in learning to read a second language. However, it is not clear whether native language experience shapes the neural mechanisms of addressed and assembled phonologies. To address this question, we trained native Chinese and native English speakers to read the same artificial language (based on Korean Hangul) either through addressed (i.e., whole-word mapping) or assembled (i.e., grapheme-to-phoneme mapping) phonology. We found that, for both native Chinese and native English speakers, addressed phonology relied on the regions in the ventral pathway, whereas assembled phonology depended on the regions in the dorsal pathway. More importantly, we found that the neural mechanisms of addressed and assembled phonologies were shaped by native language experience. Specifically, one key region for addressed phonology (i.e., the left middle temporal gyrus) showed greater activation for addressed phonology in native Chinese speakers, while one key region for assembled phonology (i.e., the left supramarginal gyrus) showed more activation for assembled phonology in native English speakers. These results provide direct neuroimaging evidence for the effect of native language experience on the neural mechanisms of phonological access in a new language and support the assimilation-accommodation hypothesis.

Citing Articles

Is learning a logographic script easier than reading an alphabetic script for German children with dyslexia?.

Kuester-Gruber S, Faisst T, Schick V, Righetti G, Braun C, Cordey-Henke A PLoS One. 2023; 18(2):e0282200.

PMID: 36827407 PMC: 9956901. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282200.


Functional neuroanatomy of reading in Czech: Evidence of a dual-route processing architecture in a shallow orthography.

Barton M, Rapcsak S, Zvoncak V, Marecek R, Cvrcek V, Rektorova I Front Psychol. 2023; 13:1037365.

PMID: 36726504 PMC: 9885179. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1037365.


Individuals' preference on reading pathways influences the involvement of neural pathways in phonological learning.

Dong J, Yue Q, Li A, Gu L, Su X, Chen Q Front Psychol. 2023; 13:1067561.

PMID: 36591053 PMC: 9794771. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1067561.


Neural representation of phonological information during Chinese character reading.

Li A, Yang R, Qu J, Dong J, Gu L, Mei L Hum Brain Mapp. 2022; 43(13):4013-4029.

PMID: 35545935 PMC: 9374885. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25900.


Origins of Dissociations in the English Past Tense: A Synthetic Brain Imaging Model.

Westermann G, Jones S Front Psychol. 2021; 12:688908.

PMID: 34276514 PMC: 8283012. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.688908.


References
1.
Paulesu E, McCrory E, Fazio F, Menoncello L, Brunswick N, Cappa S . A cultural effect on brain function. Nat Neurosci. 1999; 3(1):91-6. DOI: 10.1038/71163. View

2.
Wang M, Koda K, Perfetti C . Alphabetic and nonalphabetic L1 effects in English word identification: a comparison of Korean and Chinese English L2 learners. Cognition. 2003; 87(2):129-49. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00232-9. View

3.
Grill-Spector K . Semantic versus perceptual priming in fusiform cortex. Trends Cogn Sci. 2001; 5(6):227-228. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01665-x. View

4.
Fu S, Chen Y, Smith S, Iversen S, Matthews P . Effects of word form on brain processing of written Chinese. Neuroimage. 2002; 17(3):1538-48. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1155. View

5.
Mei L, Xue G, Lu Z, He Q, Zhang M, Xue F . Orthographic transparency modulates the functional asymmetry in the fusiform cortex: an artificial language training study. Brain Lang. 2012; 125(2):165-72. PMC: 3381927. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.01.006. View