» Articles » PMID: 25858265

Disease Activity Guided Dose Reduction and Withdrawal of Adalimumab or Etanercept Compared with Usual Care in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Open Label, Randomised Controlled, Non-inferiority Trial

Overview
Journal BMJ
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2015 Apr 11
PMID 25858265
Citations 60
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether a disease activity guided strategy of dose reduction of two tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, adalimumab or etanercept, is non-inferior in maintaining disease control in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with usual care.

Design: Randomised controlled, open label, non-inferiority strategy trial.

Setting: Two rheumatology outpatient clinics in the Netherlands, from December 2011 to May 2014.

Participants: 180 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and low disease activity using adalimumab or etanercept; 121 allocated to the dose reduction strategy, 59 to usual care.

Interventions: Disease activity guided dose reduction (advice to stepwise increase the injection interval every three months, until flare of disease activity or discontinuation) or usual care (no dose reduction advice). Flare was defined as increase in DAS28-CRP (a composite score measuring disease activity) greater than 1.2, or increase greater than 0.6 and current score of at least 3.2. In the case of flare, TNF inhibitor use was restarted or escalated.

Main Outcome Measures: Difference in proportions of patients with major flare (DAS28-CRP based flare longer than three months) between the two groups at 18 months, compared against a non-inferiority margin of 20%. Secondary outcomes included TNF inhibitor use at study end, functioning, quality of life, radiographic progression, and adverse events.

Results: Dose reduction of adalimumab or etanercept was non-inferior to usual care (proportion of patients with major flare at 18 months, 12% v 10%; difference 2%, 95% confidence interval -12% to 12%). In the dose reduction group, TNF inhibitor use could successfully be stopped in 20% (95% confidence interval 13% to 28%), the injection interval successfully increased in 43% (34% to 53%), but no dose reduction was possible in 37% (28% to 46%). Functional status, quality of life, relevant radiographic progression, and adverse events did not differ between the groups, although short lived flares (73% v 27%) and minimal radiographic progression (32% v 15%) were more frequent in dose reduction than usual care.

Conclusions: A disease activity guided, dose reduction strategy of adalimumab or etanercept to treat rheumatoid arthritis is non-inferior to usual care with regard to major flaring, while resulting in the successful dose reduction or stopping in two thirds of patients.Trial registration Dutch trial register (www.trialregister.nl), NTR 3216.

Citing Articles

Roads to remission: evolving treatment concepts in type 2 inflammatory diseases.

Lommatzsch M, Blumchen K, Beck L, Bousquet J, Brusselle G, Fokkens W EClinicalMedicine. 2025; 80:103050.

PMID: 39867971 PMC: 11764424. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103050.


Impact of concomitant methotrexate on disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis tapering abatacept: results from KOBIO registry.

Park J, Kim J, Kim M, Lim Y, Kim H, Kim J Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1418243.

PMID: 39104863 PMC: 11298490. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1418243.


What are the benefits of therapeutic drug monitoring in the optimization of adalimumab therapy? a systematic review and meta-analysis up to 2022.

Li Y, Xie C, Ding X, Wu Z, Zhang J, Zhu J Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1376708.

PMID: 39040471 PMC: 11260779. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1376708.


Prevalence and Factors Associated with De-escalation of Anti-TNFs in Older Adults with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Medicare Claims-Based Observational Study.

Lee J, Kumar N, Kabeto M, Galecki A, Chang C, Singh N Drugs Aging. 2024; 41(7):601-613.

PMID: 38900379 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-024-01125-w.


Disease activity-guided dose optimization including discontinuation of TNF inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis is effective for up to 10 years: an observational follow-up of the DRESS study.

van der Togt C, den Broeder N, Boonstra M, van der Maas A, den Broeder A, van Herwaarden N Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024; 64(2):533-540.

PMID: 38346712 PMC: 11781578. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae103.


References
1.
van der Heijde D . How to read radiographs according to the Sharp/van der Heijde method. J Rheumatol. 2000; 27(1):261-3. View

2.
Bruynesteyn K, van der Heijde D, Boers M, Saudan A, Peloso P, Paulus H . Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in rheumatoid arthritis joint damage of the Sharp/van der Heijde and Larsen/Scott scoring methods by clinical experts and comparison with the smallest detectable difference. Arthritis Rheum. 2002; 46(4):913-20. DOI: 10.1002/art.10190. View

3.
Welsing P, Landewe R, van Riel P, Boers M, van Gestel A, van der Linden S . The relationship between disease activity and radiologic progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a longitudinal analysis. Arthritis Rheum. 2004; 50(7):2082-93. DOI: 10.1002/art.20350. View

4.
Welsing P, Borm G, van Riel P . Minimal clinically important difference in radiological progression of joint damage. A definition based on patient perspective. J Rheumatol. 2006; 33(3):501-7. View

5.
Bongartz T, Sutton A, Sweeting M, Buchan I, Matteson E, Montori V . Anti-TNF antibody therapy in rheumatoid arthritis and the risk of serious infections and malignancies: systematic review and meta-analysis of rare harmful effects in randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2006; 295(19):2275-85. DOI: 10.1001/jama.295.19.2275. View