» Articles » PMID: 25852585

Regulatory Focus and Generalized Trust: the Impact of Prevention-focused Self-regulation on Trusting Others

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2015 Apr 9
PMID 25852585
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The current research suggests that taking self-regulatory mechanisms into account provides insights regarding individuals' responses to threats in social interactions. In general, based on the notion that a prevention-focused orientation of self-regulation is associated with a need for security and a vigilant tendency to avoid losses and other types of negative events we advocate that a prevention-focused orientation, both as a disposition as well as a situationally induced state, lowers generalized trust, thus hindering cooperation within social interactions that entail threats. Specifically, we found that the more individuals' habitual self-regulatory orientation is dominated by a prevention focus, the less likely they are to score high on a self-report measure of generalized trust (Study 1), and to express trust in a trust game paradigm as manifested in lower sums of transferred money (Studies 2 and 3). Similar findings were found when prevention focus was situationally manipulated (Study 4). Finally, one possible factor underlying the impact of prevention-focused self-regulation on generalized trust was demonstrated as individuals with a special sensitivity to negative information were significantly affected by a subtle prevention focus manipulation (versus control condition) in that they reacted with reduced trust in the trust game (Study 5). In sum, the current findings document the crucial relevance of self-regulatory orientations as conceptualized in regulatory focus theory regarding generalized trust and responses to threats within a social interaction. The theoretical and applied implications of the findings are discussed.

Citing Articles

Emotional Suppression and Psychological Well-Being in Marriage: The Role of Regulatory Focus and Spousal Behavior.

An U, Park H, Han D, Kim Y Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(2).

PMID: 35055793 PMC: 8775985. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19020973.


Hurry Up, We Need to Find the Key! How Regulatory Focus Design Affects Children's Trust in a Social Robot.

Calvo-Barajas N, Elgarf M, Perugia G, Paiva A, Peters C, Castellano G Front Robot AI. 2021; 8:652035.

PMID: 34307468 PMC: 8297465. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2021.652035.


Comparing Antecedents of Chinese Consumers' Trust and Distrust.

Zhao D, Shi X, Wei S, Ren J Front Psychol. 2021; 12:648883.

PMID: 34054651 PMC: 8155702. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648883.


A Trait-State Model of Trust Propensity: Evidence From Two Career Transitions.

van der Werff L, Freeney Y, Lance C, Buckley F Front Psychol. 2019; 10:2490.

PMID: 31749749 PMC: 6848461. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02490.

References
1.
Higgins E, Roney C, Crowe E, HYMES C . Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance: distinct self-regulatory systems. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994; 66(2):276-86. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.66.2.276. View

2.
Pfattheicher S, Sassenrath C . A regulatory focus perspective on eating behavior: how prevention and promotion focus relates to emotional, external, and restrained eating. Front Psychol. 2014; 5:1314. PMC: 4238324. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01314. View

3.
Acar-Burkay S, Fennis B, Warlop L . Trusting others: the polarization effect of need for closure. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014; 107(4):719-35. DOI: 10.1037/a0037022. View

4.
Balliet D, Van Lange P . Trust, conflict, and cooperation: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2012; 139(5):1090-112. DOI: 10.1037/a0030939. View

5.
Higgins E . Beyond pleasure and pain. Am Psychol. 1998; 52(12):1280-300. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.52.12.1280. View