» Articles » PMID: 25850022

Evaluation of Anthrax Vaccine Safety in 18 to 20 Year Olds: A First Step Towards Age De-escalation Studies in Adolescents

Overview
Journal Vaccine
Date 2015 Apr 8
PMID 25850022
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background/objectives: Anthrax vaccine adsorbed (AVA, BioThrax(®)) is recommended for post-exposure prophylaxis administration for the US population in response to large-scale Bacillus anthracis spore exposure. However, no information exists on AVA use in children and ethical barriers exist to performing pre-event pediatric AVA studies. A Presidential Ethics Commission proposed a potential pathway for such studies utilizing an age de-escalation process comparing safety and immunogenicity data from 18 to 20 year-olds to older adults and if acceptable proceeding to evaluations in younger adolescents. We conducted exploratory summary re-analyses of existing databases from 18 to 20 year-olds (n=74) compared to adults aged 21 to 29 years (n=243) who participated in four previous US government funded AVA studies.

Methods: Data extracted from studies included elicited local injection-site and systemic adverse events (AEs) following AVA doses given subcutaneously at 0, 2, and 4 weeks. Additionally, proportions of subjects with ≥4-fold antibody rises from baseline to post-second and post-third AVA doses (seroresponse) were obtained.

Results: Rates of any elicited local AEs were not significantly different between younger and older age groups for local events (79.2% vs. 83.8%, P=0.120) or systemic events (45.4% vs. 50.5%, P=0.188). Robust and similar proportions of seroresponses to vaccination were observed in both age groups.

Conclusions: AVA was safe and immunogenic in 18 to 20 year-olds compared to 21 to 29 year-olds. These results provide initial information to anthrax and pediatric specialists if AVA studies in adolescents are required.

Citing Articles

Ethics of age de-escalation in pediatric vaccine trials: Attending to the case of COVID-19.

Harbin A, Laventhal N, Navin M Vaccine. 2023; 41(9):1584-1588.

PMID: 36732168 PMC: 9888531. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.01.055.


Current State of Anthrax Vaccines and Key R&D Gaps Moving Forward.

Clark A, Wolfe D Microorganisms. 2020; 8(5).

PMID: 32365729 PMC: 7285291. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8050651.


Use of Anthrax Vaccine in the United States: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, 2019.

Bower W, Schiffer J, Atmar R, Keitel W, Friedlander A, Liu L MMWR Recomm Rep. 2019; 68(4):1-14.

PMID: 31834290 PMC: 6918956. DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6804a1.


Recent developments in the understanding and use of anthrax vaccine adsorbed: achieving more with less.

Schiffer J, McNeil M, Quinn C Expert Rev Vaccines. 2016; 15(9):1151-62.

PMID: 26942655 PMC: 9041331. DOI: 10.1586/14760584.2016.1162104.

References
1.
Daley M, Yih W, Glanz J, Hambidge S, Narwaney K, Yin R . Safety of diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis and inactivated poliovirus (DTaP-IPV) vaccine. Vaccine. 2014; 32(25):3019-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.03.063. View

2.
Reason D, Liberato J, Sun J, Keitel W, Zhou J . Frequency and domain specificity of toxin-neutralizing paratopes in the human antibody response to anthrax vaccine adsorbed. Infect Immun. 2009; 77(5):2030-5. PMC: 2681729. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01254-08. View

3.
Pondo T, Rose Jr C, Martin S, Keitel W, Keyserling H, Babcock J . Evaluation of sex, race, body mass index and pre-vaccination serum progesterone levels and post-vaccination serum anti-anthrax protective immunoglobulin G on injection site adverse events following anthrax vaccine adsorbed (AVA) in the CDC AVA human.... Vaccine. 2014; 32(28):3548-54. PMC: 5761064. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.04.025. View

4.
Liese J, Rieber N, Malzer T, Ocak M, Johnson D, Decker M . Reactogenicity of tetanus, diphtheria, 5-component acellular pertussis vaccine administered as a sixth consecutive acellular pertussis vaccine dose to adolescents. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2010; 29(12):1067-71. DOI: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3181ea5866. View

5.
Cook I . Sex differences in injection site reactions with human vaccines. Hum Vaccin. 2009; 5(7):441-9. DOI: 10.4161/hv.8476. View