» Articles » PMID: 25849569

Interactive and Independent Associations Between the Socioeconomic and Objective Built Environment on the Neighbourhood Level and Individual Health: a Systematic Review of Multilevel Studies

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 Apr 8
PMID 25849569
Citations 57
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The research question how contextual factors of neighbourhood environments influence individual health has gained increasing attention in public health research. Both socioeconomic neighbourhood characteristics and factors of the built environment play an important role for health and health-related behaviours. However, their reciprocal relationships have not been systematically reviewed so far. This systematic review aims to identify studies applying a multilevel modelling approach which consider both neighbourhood socioeconomic position (SEP) and factors of the objective built environment simultaneously in order to disentangle their independent and interactive effects on individual health.

Methods: The three databases PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science were systematically searched with terms for title and abstract screening. Grey literature was not included. Observational studies from USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Western European countries were considered which analysed simultaneously factors of neighbourhood SEP and the objective built environment with a multilevel modelling approach. Adjustment for individual SEP was a further inclusion criterion.

Results: Thirty-three studies were included in qualitative synthesis. Twenty-two studies showed an independent association between characteristics of neighbourhood SEP or the built environment and individual health outcomes or health-related behaviours. Twenty-one studies found cross-level or within-level interactions either between neighbourhood SEP and the built environment, or between neighbourhood SEP or the built environment and individual characteristics, such as sex, individual SEP or ethnicity. Due to the large variation of study design and heterogeneous reporting of results the identification of consistent findings was problematic and made quantitative analysis not possible.

Conclusions: There is a need for studies considering multiple neighbourhood dimensions and applying multilevel modelling in order to clarify their causal relationship towards individual health. Especially, more studies using comparable characteristics of neighbourhood SEP and the objective built environment and analysing interactive effects are necessary to disentangle health impacts and identify vulnerable neighbourhoods and population groups.

Citing Articles

Association between snack intake behaviors of children and neighboring women: A population-based cross-sectional analysis with spatial regionalization.

Yamamoto E, Takagi D, Hashimoto H SSM Popul Health. 2024; 28:101720.

PMID: 39506981 PMC: 11539136. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101720.


Do Publicly Funded Neighborhood Investments Impact Individual-Level Health-Related Outcomes? A Longitudinal Study of Two Neighborhoods in Pittsburgh, PA from 2011 to 2018.

Smith R, Baird M, Hunter G, Ghosh-Dastidar B, Richardson A, Cantor J Hous Policy Debate. 2024; 34(4):489-507.

PMID: 39157451 PMC: 11328983. DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2024.2309952.


Are Neighborhood Greenspaces Associated with Leisure-time Physical Activity? Results from ELSA-Brasil Eight-year Follow-up.

Almeida L, Barreto S, Conceicao Chagas Almeida M, Bensenor I, Lotufo P, Molina M J Urban Health. 2024; 101(6):1155-1165.

PMID: 39107618 PMC: 11652451. DOI: 10.1007/s11524-024-00896-2.


Mobility Infrastructures and Health: Scoping Review of studies in Europe.

Michel S, Banwell N, Senn N Public Health Rev. 2024; 45:1606862.

PMID: 38841179 PMC: 11150585. DOI: 10.3389/phrs.2024.1606862.


Greenspaces and Health: Scoping Review of studies in Europe.

Banwell N, Michel S, Senn N Public Health Rev. 2024; 45:1606863.

PMID: 38831866 PMC: 11144923. DOI: 10.3389/phrs.2024.1606863.


References
1.
Wen M, Zhang X . Contextual effects of built and social environments of urban neighborhoods on exercise: a multilevel study in Chicago. Am J Health Promot. 2009; 23(4):247-54. DOI: 10.4278/ajhp.07052448. View

2.
Sundquist K, Eriksson U, Kawakami N, Skog L, Ohlsson H, Arvidsson D . Neighborhood walkability, physical activity, and walking behavior: the Swedish Neighborhood and Physical Activity (SNAP) study. Soc Sci Med. 2011; 72(8):1266-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.03.004. View

3.
Northridge M, Sclar E, Biswas P . Sorting out the connections between the built environment and health: a conceptual framework for navigating pathways and planning healthy cities. J Urban Health. 2004; 80(4):556-68. PMC: 3456215. DOI: 10.1093/jurban/jtg064. View

4.
Dragano N, Hoffmann B, Stang A, Moebus S, Verde P, Weyers S . Subclinical coronary atherosclerosis and neighbourhood deprivation in an urban region. Eur J Epidemiol. 2008; 24(1):25-35. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-008-9292-9. View

5.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009; 339:b2535. PMC: 2714657. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b2535. View