» Articles » PMID: 25846721

One-year Sustained Glycaemic Control and Less Hypoglycaemia with New Insulin Glargine 300 U/ml Compared with 100 U/ml in People with Type 2 Diabetes Using Basal Plus Meal-time Insulin: the EDITION 1 12-month Randomized Trial, Including 6-month...

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2015 Apr 8
PMID 25846721
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the maintenance of efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300) versus glargine 100 U/ml (Gla-100) in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using basal plus meal-time insulin for 12 months in the EDITION 1 trial.

Methods: EDITION 1 was a multicentre, randomized, open-label, two-arm, phase IIIa study. Participants completing the initial 6-month treatment period continued to receive Gla-300 or Gla-100, as previously randomized, once daily for a further 6-month open-label extension phase. Changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and fasting plasma glucose concentrations, insulin dose, hypoglycaemic events and body weight were assessed.

Results: Of 807 participants enrolled in the initial phase, 89% (359/404) assigned to Gla-300 and 88% (355/403) assigned to Gla-100 completed 12 months. Glycaemic control was sustained in both groups (mean HbA1c: Gla-300, 7.24%; Gla-100, 7.42%), with more sustained HbA1c reduction for Gla-300 at 12 months: least squares mean difference Gla-300 vs Gla-100: HbA1c -0.17 [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.30 to -0.05]%. The mean daily basal insulin dose at 12 months was 1.03 U/kg for Gla-300 and 0.90 U/kg for Gla-100. Lower percentages of participants had ≥1 confirmed [≤3.9 mmol/l (≤70 mg/dl)] or severe hypoglycaemic event with Gla-300 than Gla-100 at any time of day [24 h; 86 vs 92%; relative risk 0.94 (95% CI 0.89-0.99)] and during the night [54 vs 65%; relative risk 0.84 (95% CI 0.75-0.94)], while the annualized rates of such hypoglycaemic events were similar. No between-treatment differences in adverse events were apparent.

Conclusion: During 12 months of treatment of T2DM requiring basal and meal-time insulin, glycaemic control was better sustained and fewer individuals reported hypoglycaemia with Gla-300 than with Gla-100. The mean basal insulin dose was higher with Gla-300 compared with Gla-100, but total numbers of hypoglycaemic events and overall tolerability did not differ between treatments.

Citing Articles

9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.

Diabetes Care. 2024; 48(Supplement_1):S181-S206.

PMID: 39651989 PMC: 11635045. DOI: 10.2337/dc25-S009.


Efficacy and safety of basal insulins in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Dehghani M, Sadeghi M, Barzkar F, Maghsoomi Z, Janani L, Motevalian S Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15:1286827.

PMID: 38586456 PMC: 10997219. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1286827.


9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024.

Diabetes Care. 2023; 47(Suppl 1):S158-S178.

PMID: 38078590 PMC: 10725810. DOI: 10.2337/dc24-S009.


9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023.

ElSayed N, Aleppo G, Aroda V, Bannuru R, Brown F, Bruemmer D Diabetes Care. 2022; 46(Suppl 1):S140-S157.

PMID: 36507650 PMC: 9810476. DOI: 10.2337/dc23-S009.


Effectiveness and Safety of Insulin Glargine 300 U/ml in Comparison with Insulin Degludec 100 U/ml Evaluated with Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes and Suboptimal Glycemic Control in Routine Clinical Practice: The OneCARE....

Conget I, Mangas M, Morales C, Caro J, Gimenez M, Borrell M Diabetes Ther. 2021; 12(11):2993-3009.

PMID: 34599749 PMC: 8519995. DOI: 10.1007/s13300-021-01153-4.


References
1.
Yki-Jarvinen H, Bergenstal R, Ziemen M, Wardecki M, Muehlen-Bartmer I, Boelle E . New insulin glargine 300 units/mL versus glargine 100 units/mL in people with type 2 diabetes using oral agents and basal insulin: glucose control and hypoglycemia in a 6-month randomized controlled trial (EDITION 2). Diabetes Care. 2014; 37(12):3235-43. DOI: 10.2337/dc14-0990. View

2.
Bolli G, Riddle M, Bergenstal R, Ziemen M, Sestakauskas K, Goyeau H . New insulin glargine 300 U/ml compared with glargine 100 U/ml in insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes on oral glucose-lowering drugs: a randomized controlled trial (EDITION 3). Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015; 17(4):386-94. PMC: 4409854. DOI: 10.1111/dom.12438. View

3.
Becker R, Dahmen R, Bergmann K, Lehmann A, Jax T, Heise T . New insulin glargine 300 Units · mL-1 provides a more even activity profile and prolonged glycemic control at steady state compared with insulin glargine 100 Units · mL-1. Diabetes Care. 2014; 38(4):637-43. DOI: 10.2337/dc14-0006. View

4.
. Defining and reporting hypoglycemia in diabetes: a report from the American Diabetes Association Workgroup on Hypoglycemia. Diabetes Care. 2005; 28(5):1245-9. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.28.5.1245. View

5.
Bolli G, Marinelli Andreoli A, Lucidi P . Optimizing the replacement of basal insulin in type 1 diabetes mellitus: no longer an elusive goal in the post-NPH era. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011; 13 Suppl 1:S43-52. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2011.0039. View