» Articles » PMID: 25840654

Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Plain Film Radiographs Between Original Film and Smartphone Capture: a Pilot Study

Overview
Journal J Digit Imaging
Publisher Springer
Date 2015 Apr 5
PMID 25840654
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The use of mobile devices for medical image capture has become increasingly popular given the widespread use of smartphone cameras. Prior studies have generally compared mobile phone capture images to digitized images. However, many underserved and rural areas without picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) still depend greatly on the use of film radiographs. Additionally, there is a scarcity of specialty-trained or formally licensed radiologists in many of these regions. Subsequently, there is great potential for the use of smartphone capture of plain radiograph films which would allow for increased access to economical and efficient consultation from board-certified radiologists abroad. The present study addresses the ability to diagnose a subset of radiographic findings identified on both the original film radiograph and the captured camera phone image.

Citing Articles

Diagnostic accuracy and reliability of smartphone captured radiologic images communicated via WhatsApp®.

Ntja U, van Rensburg J, Joubert G Afr J Emerg Med. 2022; 12(1):67-70.

PMID: 35070657 PMC: 8761606. DOI: 10.1016/j.afjem.2021.11.001.


Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Anomalies with a Handheld Smartphone.

Lin C, Zimmerman S, Chu L, Eng J, Fishman E J Digit Imaging. 2017; 30(6):732-737.

PMID: 28560509 PMC: 5681475. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-017-9982-5.


Digitizing an Analog Radiography Teaching File Under Time Constraint: Trade-Offs in Efficiency and Image Quality.

Loehfelm T, Prater A, Debebe T, Sekhar A J Digit Imaging. 2016; 30(1):49-54.

PMID: 27644957 PMC: 5267599. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-016-9906-9.


Mobile devices and their prospective future role in emergency radiology.

OConnell T, Patlas M Br J Radiol. 2015; 89(1061):20150820.

PMID: 26689095 PMC: 4985455. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150820.

References
1.
Lamirel C, Bruce B, Wright D, Newman N, Biousse V . Nonmydriatic digital ocular fundus photography on the iPhone 3G: the FOTO-ED study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012; 130(7):939-40. PMC: 3501143. DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.2488. View

2.
Salazar A, Camacho J, Aguirre D . Comparison between different cost devices for digital capture of X-ray films: an image characteristics detection approach. J Digit Imaging. 2011; 25(1):91-100. PMC: 3264722. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-011-9391-0. View

3.
Peretz B, Kaffe I, Amir E . Digital images obtained with a digital camera are not associated with a loss of critical information--a preliminary study. Br Dent J. 2009; 206(5):E9. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.182. View

4.
Bullard T, Rosenberg M, Ladde J, Razack N, Villalobos H, Papa L . Digital images taken with a mobile phone can assist in the triage of neurosurgical patients to a level 1 trauma centre. J Telemed Telecare. 2013; 19(2):80-3. DOI: 10.1177/1357633x13476228. View

5.
Brault B, Hoskinson J, Armbrust L, Milliken G . Comparison of seven digital cameras for digitizing radiographs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2004; 45(4):298-304. DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2004.04055.x. View