» Articles » PMID: 25826114

The Role of APOE-ɛ4 and Beta Amyloid in the Differential Rate of Recovery from ECT: a Review

Overview
Date 2015 Apr 1
PMID 25826114
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Individual biological differences may contribute to the variability of outcomes, including cognitive effects, observed following electroconvulsive treatment (ECT). A narrative review of the research literature on carriage of the apolipoprotein E ɛ4 allele (APOE-ɛ4) and the protein biomarker beta amyloid (Aβ) with ECT cognitive outcome was undertaken. ECT induces repeated brain seizures and there is debate as to whether this causes brain injury and long-term cognitive disruption. The majority of ECT is administered to the elderly (over age 65 years) with drug-resistant depression. Depression in the elderly may be a symptom of the prodromal stage of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Carriage of the APOE-ɛ4 allele and raised cerebral Aβ are consistently implicated in AD, but inconsistently implicated in brain injury (and related syndromes) recovery rates. A paucity of brain-related recovery, genetic and biomarker research in ECT responses in the elderly was found: three studies have examined the effect of APOE-ɛ4 allele carriage on cognition in the depressed elderly receiving ECT, and two have examined Aβ changes after ECT, with contradictory findings. Cognitive changes in all studies of ECT effects were measured by a variety of psychological tests, making comparisons of such changes between studies problematic. Further, psychological test data-validity measures were not routinely administered, counter to current testing recommendations. The methodological issues of the currently available literature as well as the need for well-designed, hypothesis driven, longitudinal studies are discussed.

Citing Articles

Neurobiological Highlights of Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatric Disorders.

Morozova A, Zorkina Y, Abramova O, Pavlova O, Pavlov K, Soloveva K Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(3).

PMID: 35163141 PMC: 8835608. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23031217.


Brain Stimulation in Alzheimer's Disease.

Chang C, Lane H, Lin C Front Psychiatry. 2018; 9:201.

PMID: 29910746 PMC: 5992378. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00201.


Biomarkers for Early Diagnostic of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Type-2 Diabetes Patients: A Multicentre, Retrospective, Nested Case-Control Study.

Xu Z, Yang S, Zhao S, Zheng C, Li H, Zhang Y EBioMedicine. 2016; 5:105-13.

PMID: 27077117 PMC: 4816853. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.02.014.

References
1.
Huuhka M, Anttila S, Leinonen E, Huuhka K, Rontu R, Mattila K . The apolipoprotein E polymorphism is not associated with response to electroconvulsive therapy in major depressive disorder. J ECT. 2005; 21(1):7-11. DOI: 10.1097/01.yct.0000153210.25362.ea. View

2.
Verwijk E, Comijs H, Kok R, Spaans H, Stek M, Scherder E . Neurocognitive effects after brief pulse and ultrabrief pulse unilateral electroconvulsive therapy for major depression: a review. J Affect Disord. 2012; 140(3):233-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.02.024. View

3.
Loo C, Katalinic N, Martin D, Schweitzer I . A review of ultrabrief pulse width electroconvulsive therapy. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2012; 3(2):69-85. PMC: 3513900. DOI: 10.1177/2040622311432493. View

4.
Edwards E, Spira A, Barnes D, Yaffe K . Neuropsychiatric symptoms in mild cognitive impairment: differences by subtype and progression to dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009; 24(7):716-22. PMC: 2735341. DOI: 10.1002/gps.2187. View

5.
Rothman S, Olney J . Glutamate and the pathophysiology of hypoxic--ischemic brain damage. Ann Neurol. 1986; 19(2):105-11. DOI: 10.1002/ana.410190202. View