» Articles » PMID: 25825683

Bayesian Inference of Protein Structure from Chemical Shift Data

Overview
Journal PeerJ
Date 2015 Apr 1
PMID 25825683
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Protein chemical shifts are routinely used to augment molecular mechanics force fields in protein structure simulations, with weights of the chemical shift restraints determined empirically. These weights, however, might not be an optimal descriptor of a given protein structure and predictive model, and a bias is introduced which might result in incorrect structures. In the inferential structure determination framework, both the unknown structure and the disagreement between experimental and back-calculated data are formulated as a joint probability distribution, thus utilizing the full information content of the data. Here, we present the formulation of such a probability distribution where the error in chemical shift prediction is described by either a Gaussian or Cauchy distribution. The methodology is demonstrated and compared to a set of empirically weighted potentials through Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations of three small proteins (ENHD, Protein G and the SMN Tudor Domain) using the PROFASI force field and the chemical shift predictor CamShift. Using a clustering-criterion for identifying the best structure, together with the addition of a solvent exposure scoring term, the simulations suggests that sampling both the structure and the uncertainties in chemical shift prediction leads more accurate structures compared to conventional methods using empirical determined weights. The Cauchy distribution, using either sampled uncertainties or predetermined weights, did, however, result in overall better convergence to the native fold, suggesting that both types of distribution might be useful in different aspects of the protein structure prediction.

Citing Articles

Intelligent resolution: Integrating Cryo-EM with AI-driven multi-resolution simulations to observe the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 replication-transcription machinery in action.

Trifan A, Gorgun D, Salim M, Li Z, Brace A, Zvyagin M Int J High Perform Comput Appl. 2024; 36(5-6):603-623.

PMID: 38464362 PMC: 10923581. DOI: 10.1177/10943420221113513.


Informing NMR experiments with molecular dynamics simulations to characterize the dominant activated state of the KcsA ion channel.

Perez-Conesa S, Keeler E, Zhang D, Delemotte L, McDermott A J Chem Phys. 2021; 154(16):165102.

PMID: 33940802 PMC: 9250420. DOI: 10.1063/5.0040649.


Protein structure refinement using a quantum mechanics-based chemical shielding predictor.

Bratholm L, Jensen J Chem Sci. 2017; 8(3):2061-2072.

PMID: 28451325 PMC: 5399634. DOI: 10.1039/c6sc04344e.


ProCS15: a DFT-based chemical shift predictor for backbone and Cβ atoms in proteins.

Larsen A, Bratholm L, Christensen A, Channir M, Jensen J PeerJ. 2015; 3:e1344.

PMID: 26623185 PMC: 4662583. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1344.

References
1.
Cavalli A, Salvatella X, Dobson C, Vendruscolo M . Protein structure determination from NMR chemical shifts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(23):9615-20. PMC: 1887584. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0610313104. View

2.
Meiler J, Baker D . Rapid protein fold determination using unassigned NMR data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(26):15404-9. PMC: 307580. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2434121100. View

3.
Orban J, Alexander P, Bryan P . Sequence-specific 1H NMR assignments and secondary structure of the streptococcal protein G B2-domain. Biochemistry. 1992; 31(14):3604-11. DOI: 10.1021/bi00129a008. View

4.
Boomsma W, Tian P, Frellsen J, Ferkinghoff-Borg J, Hamelryck T, Lindorff-Larsen K . Equilibrium simulations of proteins using molecular fragment replacement and NMR chemical shifts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(38):13852-7. PMC: 4183297. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1404948111. View

5.
Snow C, Nguyen H, Pande V, Gruebele M . Absolute comparison of simulated and experimental protein-folding dynamics. Nature. 2002; 420(6911):102-6. DOI: 10.1038/nature01160. View