Analysis of Cytokine Production by Peanut-reactive T Cells Identifies Residual Th2 Effectors in Highly Allergic Children Who Received Peanut Oral Immunotherapy
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Only limited evidence is available regarding the cytokine repertoire of effector T cells associated with peanut allergy, and how these responses relate to IgE antibodies to peanut components.
Objective: To interrogate T cell effector cytokine populations induced by Ara h 1 and Ara h 2 among peanut allergic (PA) children in the context of IgE and to evaluate their modulation during oral immunotherapy (OIT).
Methods: Peanut-reactive effector T cells were analysed in conjunction with specific IgE profiles in PA children using intracellular staining and multiplex assay. Cytokine-expressing T cell subpopulations were visualized using SPICE.
Results: Ara h 2 dominated the antibody response to peanut as judged by prevalence and quantity among a cohort of children with IgE to peanut. High IgE (> 15 kU(A)/L) was almost exclusively associated with dual sensitization to Ara h 1 and Ara h 2 and was age independent. Among PA children, IL-4-biased responses to both major allergens were induced, regardless of whether IgE antibodies to Ara h 1 were present. Among subjects receiving OIT in whom high IgE was maintained, Th2 reactivity to peanut components persisted despite clinical desensitization and modulation of allergen-specific immune parameters including augmented specific IgG4 antibodies, Th1 skewing and enhanced IL-10. The complexity of cytokine-positive subpopulations within peanut-reactive IL-4(+) and IFN-γ(+) T cells was similar to that observed in those who received no OIT, but was modified with extended therapy. Nonetheless, high Foxp3 expression was a distinguishing feature of peanut-reactive IL-4(+) T cells irrespective of OIT, and a correlate of their ability to secrete type 2 cytokines.
Conclusion: Although total numbers of peanut-reactive IL-4(+) and IFN-γ(+) T cells are modulated by OIT in highly allergic children, complex T cell populations with pathogenic potential persist in the presence of recognized immune markers of successful immunotherapy.
Zhou X, Dunham D, Sindher S, Long A, Fernandes A, Chang I Allergy. 2024; 80(3):762-774.
PMID: 39291303 PMC: 11893263. DOI: 10.1111/all.16311.
Targeting type 2 immunity and the future of food allergy treatment.
Berin M J Exp Med. 2023; 220(4).
PMID: 36880703 PMC: 9997511. DOI: 10.1084/jem.20221104.
Lozano-Ojalvo D, Tyler S, Aranda C, Wang J, Sicherer S, Sampson H Allergy. 2022; 78(3):697-713.
PMID: 36089900 PMC: 10111618. DOI: 10.1111/all.15512.
Berin M, Agashe C, Burks A, Chiang D, Davidson W, Dawson P J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021; 149(4):1373-1382.e12.
PMID: 34653515 PMC: 8995337. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.09.029.
Oral Immunotherapy for Food-Allergic Children: A Pro-Con Debate.
Mori F, Giovannini M, Barni S, Jimenez-Saiz R, Munblit D, Biagioni B Front Immunol. 2021; 12:636612.
PMID: 34650547 PMC: 8507468. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.636612.