» Articles » PMID: 25822529

A Color-coded Tape for Uterine Height Measurement: a Tool to Identify Preterm Pregnancies in Low Resource Settings

Abstract

Introduction: Neonatal mortality associated with preterm birth can be reduced with antenatal corticosteroids (ACS), yet <10% of eligible pregnant women in low-middle income countries. The inability to accurately determine gestational age (GA) leads to under-identification of high-risk women who could receive ACS or other interventions. To facilitate better identification in low-resource settings, we developed a color-coded tape for uterine height (UH) measurement and estimated its accuracy identifying preterm pregnancies.

Methods: We designed a series of colored-coded tapes with segments corresponding to UH measurements for 20-23.6 weeks, 24.0-35.6 weeks, and >36.0 weeks GA. In phase 1, UH measurements were collected prospectively in the Democratic Republic of Congo, India and Pakistan, using distinct tapes to address variation across regions and ethnicities. In phase 2, we tested accuracy in 250 pregnant women with known GA from early ultrasound enrolled at prenatal clinics in Argentina, India, Pakistan and Zambia. Providers masked to the ultrasound GA measured UH. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was conducted.

Results: 1,029 pregnant women were enrolled. In all countries the tapes were most effective identifying pregnancies between 20.0-35.6 weeks, compared to the other GAs. The ROC areas under the curves and 95% confidence intervals were: Argentina 0.69 (0.63, 0.74); Zambia 0.72 (0.66, 0.78), India 0.84 (0.80, 0.89), and Pakistan 0.83 (0.78, 0.87). The sensitivity and specificity (and 95% confidence intervals) for identifying pregnancies between 20.0-35.6 weeks, respectively, were: Argentina 87% (82%-92%) and 51% (42%-61%); Zambia 91% (86%-95%) and 50% (40%-60%); India 78% (71%-85%) and 89% (83%-94%); Pakistan 63% (55%-70%) and 94% (89%-99%).

Conclusions: We observed moderate-good accuracy identifying pregnancies ≤ 35.6 weeks gestation, with potential usefulness at the community level in low-middle income countries to facilitate the preterm identification and interventions to reduce preterm neonatal mortality. Further research is needed to validate these findings on a population basis.

Citing Articles

Measurement of symphysis fundal height for gestational age estimation in low-to-middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Whelan R, Schaeffer L, Olson I, Folger L, Alam S, Ajaz N PLoS One. 2022; 17(8):e0272718.

PMID: 36007078 PMC: 9409500. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272718.


Report on an international workshop on kangaroo mother care: lessons learned and a vision for the future.

Cattaneo A, Amani A, Charpak N, De Leon-Mendoza S, Moxon S, Nimbalkar S BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018; 18(1):170.

PMID: 29769056 PMC: 5956892. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-018-1819-9.


The global network antenatal corticosteroids trial: impact on stillbirth.

Goldenberg R, Thorsten V, Althabe F, Saleem S, Garces A, Carlo W Reprod Health. 2016; 13(1):68.

PMID: 27255082 PMC: 4891888. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-016-0174-4.


Use of antenatal corticosteroids at health facilities and communities in low-and-middle income countries.

Berrueta M, Hemingway-Foday J, Thorsten V, Goldenberg R, Carlo W, Garces A Reprod Health. 2016; 13(1):66.

PMID: 27228986 PMC: 4882797. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-016-0176-2.


Count every newborn; a measurement improvement roadmap for coverage data.

Moxon S, Ruysen H, Kerber K, Amouzou A, Fournier S, Grove J BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015; 15 Suppl 2:S8.

PMID: 26391444 PMC: 4577758. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-15-S2-S8.


References
1.
Belizan J, McClure E, Goudar S, Pasha O, Esamai F, Patel A . Neonatal death in low- to middle-income countries: a global network study. Am J Perinatol. 2012; 29(8):649-56. PMC: 4337792. DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1314885. View

2.
White L, Lee S, Stepniewska K, Simpson J, Dwell S, Arunjerdja R . Estimation of gestational age from fundal height: a solution for resource-poor settings. J R Soc Interface. 2011; 9(68):503-10. PMC: 3262426. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2011.0376. View

3.
Jehan I, Zaidi S, Rizvi S, Mobeen N, McClure E, Munoz B . Dating gestational age by last menstrual period, symphysis-fundal height, and ultrasound in urban Pakistan. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010; 110(3):231-4. PMC: 2914118. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.03.030. View

4.
Bland J, Altman D . Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999; 8(2):135-60. DOI: 10.1177/096228029900800204. View

5.
Faustin D, Gutierrez L, Gintautas J, CALAME R . Clinical assessment of gestational age: a comparison of two methods. J Natl Med Assoc. 1991; 83(5):425-9. PMC: 2627084. View