» Articles » PMID: 2581148

The Interaction of McN-A-343 with Pirenzepine and Other Selective Muscarine Receptor Antagonists at a Prejunctional Muscarine Receptor

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1985 Feb 1
PMID 2581148
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The effect of several muscarine receptor antagonists on responses to carbachol (CCh) and McN-A-343 (McN) were compared in the perfused rabbit ear artery preparation stimulated via noradrenergic nerves at 3 Hz in the presence of cocaine (10 microM) and yohimbine (1 microM). The slope of the dose-response curve to McN was significantly less (P less than 0.05) than that for CCh although both agonists produced up to 100% inhibition of responses to nervous stimulation. All the antagonists investigated produced parallel shifts of the dose-response curve to the agonists and atropine, fenipramide or stercuronium gave a similar pA2 value with either agonist. Pirenzepine was a competitive antagonist when CCh was used, as judged by a slope of 0.96 +/- 0.10 for the Arunlakshana-Schild (A-S) plot (pKB 6.2). Displacement of 3H-(-)QNB binding by pirenzepine gave a pKI value of 6.0 which was not significantly different to the pKB value. When McN was used as the agonist, the dose-ratios obtained with pirenzepine (0.5 microM) were significantly different (P less than 0.01) to those with CCh as agonist and the slope of the A-S plot over the concentration range of 0.1 to 3 microM was significantly less than 1.0 (P less than 0.01), indicating that the inhibition was not a simple competitive interaction. It is suggested that the interaction of McN and pirenzepine may involve an allosteric mechanism.

Citing Articles

Allosteric modulation of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors.

Gregory K, Sexton P, Christopoulos A Curr Neuropharmacol. 2009; 5(3):157-67.

PMID: 19305798 PMC: 2656816. DOI: 10.2174/157015907781695946.


Interaction of some muscarinic agonists and antagonists at the prejunctional muscarinic receptor in the rabbit ear artery preparation.

Choo L, Mitchelson F, Vong Y Br J Pharmacol. 1986; 87(4):733-40.

PMID: 3708206 PMC: 1916798. DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1986.tb14591.x.


A quantitative study of the effects of some muscarinic antagonists on the guinea-pig olfactory cortex slice.

Williams S, Constanti A Br J Pharmacol. 1988; 93(4):855-62.

PMID: 3390654 PMC: 1853873. DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1988.tb11472.x.


Evidence for facilitatory and inhibitory muscarinic receptors on postganglionic sympathetic nerves in mouse isolated atria.

Cost M, Majewski H Br J Pharmacol. 1991; 102(4):855-60.

PMID: 1713109 PMC: 1917992. DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1991.tb12266.x.


Prejunctional muscarine receptors in the rabbit ear artery differ from M1, M2 and M3 muscarine receptors.

Darroch S, Choo L, Mitchelson F Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1992; 345(3):288-95.

PMID: 1352380 DOI: 10.1007/BF00168689.

References
1.
Taira N, Matsumura S, Hashimoto K . Excitation of the parasympathetic ganglia of the canine urinary bladder through a muscarinic mechanism. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1971; 176(1):93-100. View

2.
ROSZKOWSKI A . An unusual type of sympathetic ganglionic stimulant. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1961; 132:156-70. View

3.
Roeske W, Venter J . The differential loss of [3H]pirenzepine vs [3H] (-) quinuclidinylbenzilate binding to soluble rat brain muscarinic receptors indicates that pirenzepine binds to an allosteric state of the muscarinic receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1984; 118(3):950-7. DOI: 10.1016/0006-291x(84)91487-6. View

4.
Brown D, Forward A, Marsh S . Antagonist discrimination between ganglionic and ileal muscarinic receptors. Br J Pharmacol. 1980; 71(2):362-4. PMC: 2044477. DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1980.tb10948.x. View

5.
Fozard J, Muscholl E . Atropine-resistant effects of the muscarinic agonists McN-A-343 and AHR 602 on cardiac performance and the release of noradrenaline from sympathetic nerves of the perfused rabbit heart. Br J Pharmacol. 1974; 50(4):531-41. PMC: 1776715. DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1974.tb08586.x. View