» Articles » PMID: 25802803

Web Party Effect: a Cocktail Party Effect in the Web Environment

Overview
Journal PeerJ
Date 2015 Mar 25
PMID 25802803
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In goal-directed web navigation, labels compete for selection: this process often involves knowledge integration and requires selective attention to manage the dizziness of web layouts. Here we ask whether the competition for selection depends on all web navigation options or only on those options that are more likely to be useful for information seeking, and provide evidence in favor of the latter alternative. Participants in our experiment navigated a representative set of real websites of variable complexity, in order to reach an information goal located two clicks away from the starting home page. The time needed to reach the goal was accounted for by a novel measure of home page complexity based on a part of (not all) web options: the number of links embedded within web navigation elements weighted by the number and type of embedding elements. Our measure fully mediated the effect of several standard complexity metrics (the overall number of links, words, images, graphical regions, the JPEG file size of home page screenshots) on information seeking time and usability ratings. Furthermore, it predicted the cognitive demand of web navigation, as revealed by the duration judgment ratio (i.e., the ratio of subjective to objective duration of information search). Results demonstrate that focusing on relevant links while ignoring other web objects optimizes the deployment of attentional resources necessary to navigation. This is in line with a web party effect (i.e., a cocktail party effect in the web environment): users tune into web elements that are relevant for the achievement of their navigation goals and tune out all others.

Citing Articles

Comparing online cognitive load on mobile versus PC-based devices.

Caldiroli C, Gasparini F, Corchs S, Mangiatordi A, Garbo R, Antonietti A Pers Ubiquitous Comput. 2023; 27(2):495-505.

PMID: 36594048 PMC: 9795953. DOI: 10.1007/s00779-022-01707-8.


Don't worry, be active: how to facilitate the detection of errors in immersive virtual environments.

Rigutti S, Straga M, Jez M, Baldassi G, Carnaghi A, Miceu P PeerJ. 2018; 6:e5844.

PMID: 30397547 PMC: 6211266. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5844.


Investigating the relationship between intergroup physical contact and attitudes towards foreigners: the mediating role of quality of intergroup contact.

Shamloo S, Carnaghi A, Fantoni C PeerJ. 2018; 6:e5680.

PMID: 30280046 PMC: 6164546. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5680.


Faster but Less Careful Prehension in Presence of High, Rather than Low, Social Status Attendees.

Fantoni C, Rigutti S, Piccoli V, Sommacal E, Carnaghi A PLoS One. 2016; 11(6):e0158095.

PMID: 27351978 PMC: 4924863. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158095.


Bodily action penetrates affective perception.

Fantoni C, Rigutti S, Gerbino W PeerJ. 2016; 4:e1677.

PMID: 26893964 PMC: 4756752. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1677.

References
1.
Eisler H . Experiments on subjective duration 1968-1975: a collection of power function exponents. Psychol Bull. 1976; 83(6):1154-71. View

2.
Macar F, Grondin S, Casini L . Controlled attention sharing influences time estimation. Mem Cognit. 1994; 22(6):673-86. DOI: 10.3758/bf03209252. View

3.
Rau P, Peng S, Yang C . Time distortion for expert and novice online game players. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2006; 9(4):396-403. DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.396. View

4.
SIMONS . Attentional capture and inattentional blindness. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000; 4(4):147-155. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01455-8. View

5.
Shinn-Cunningham B . Object-based auditory and visual attention. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008; 12(5):182-6. PMC: 2699558. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.003. View