» Articles » PMID: 25800875

Assessing Community Assembly Along a Successional Gradient in the North Adriatic Karst with Functional and Phylogenetic Distances

Overview
Journal Oecologia
Date 2015 Mar 25
PMID 25800875
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recently, two approaches to account for ecological differences in community composition have been developed: one based on trait differences (functional diversity) and another based on evolutionary history (phylogenetic diversity). Combining them allows an integrated view of processes structuring communities. The North Adriatic Karst is covered by species-rich grasslands, but land abandonment has resulted in replacement by woodlands. This creates a successional gradient along which environmental conditions may change, and different community assembly rules may apply. We sampled 56 plant communities in the Karst and used functional-phylogenetic distances to assess assembly along a successional gradient, from grasslands to shrublands and woodlands. We found 146 species, for which we measured functional traits and built a phylogenetic tree. The three successional stages were floristically different, with grasslands having species that are typical of harsher soil conditions and woodlands with species preferring milder soil conditions. All communities had higher functional than phylogenetic distances, implying that closely related species tended to be phenotypically dissimilar. When more importance was given to functional distances, most grasslands and some shrublands were underdispersed; when more importance was given to phylogenetic distances, only one grassland was underdispersed and one woodland was overdispersed. Combining functional and phylogenetic distances provided us with better estimates of ecological differences in a successional gradient, where environmental filters seem to be the dominant force in early stages and competitive exclusion becomes more important in later stages. Taking into account that sucessional stages are assembled by different rules is essential to predicting their behaviour under future environmental scenarios.

Citing Articles

Stochastic process drives the dissimilarity in biodiversity patterns between coniferous forest and evergreen deciduous broad-leaved mixed forest in karst area.

Fan X, Meng L, Wang Y, Zang L PeerJ. 2024; 12:e17899.

PMID: 39224826 PMC: 11368079. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17899.


Trait assembly in grasslands depends on habitat history and spatial scale.

Saar L, de Bello F, Partel M, Helm A Oecologia. 2017; 184(1):1-12.

PMID: 28101635 DOI: 10.1007/s00442-017-3812-9.

References
1.
Kraft N, Cornwell W, Webb C, Ackerly D . Trait evolution, community assembly, and the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities. Am Nat. 2007; 170(2):271-83. DOI: 10.1086/519400. View

2.
Gotzenberger L, de Bello F, Brathen K, Davison J, Dubuis A, Guisan A . Ecological assembly rules in plant communities--approaches, patterns and prospects. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2011; 87(1):111-27. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00187.x. View

3.
Cadotte M, Albert C, Walker S . The ecology of differences: assessing community assembly with trait and evolutionary distances. Ecol Lett. 2013; 16(10):1234-44. DOI: 10.1111/ele.12161. View

4.
Jombart T, Pavoine S, Devillard S, Pontier D . Putting phylogeny into the analysis of biological traits: a methodological approach. J Theor Biol. 2010; 264(3):693-701. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.03.038. View

5.
Sutherland W . Conservation biology: openness in management. Nature. 2002; 418(6900):834-5. DOI: 10.1038/418834a. View