» Articles » PMID: 25799093

Influence of Bench Angle on Upper Extremity Muscular Activation During Bench Press Exercise

Overview
Journal Eur J Sport Sci
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2015 Mar 24
PMID 25799093
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study compared the muscular activation of the pectoralis major, anterior deltoid and triceps brachii during a free-weight barbell bench press performed at 0°, 30°, 45° and -15° bench angles. Fourteen healthy resistance trained males (age 21.4 ± 0.4 years) participated in this study. One set of six repetitions for each bench press conditions at 65% one repetition maximum were performed. Surface electromyography (sEMG) was utilised to examine the muscular activation of the selected muscles during the eccentric and concentric phases. In addition, each phase was subdivided into 25% contraction durations, resulting in four separate time points for comparison between bench conditions. The sEMG of upper pectoralis displayed no difference during any of the bench conditions when examining the complete concentric contraction, however differences during 26-50% contraction duration were found for both the 30° [122.5 ± 10.1% maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC)] and 45° (124 ± 9.1% MVIC) bench condition, resulting in greater sEMG compared to horizontal (98.2 ± 5.4% MVIC) and -15 (96.1 ± 5.5% MVIC). The sEMG of lower pectoralis was greater during -15° (100.4 ± 5.7% MVIC), 30° (86.6 ± 4.8% MVIC) and horizontal (100.1 ± 5.2% MVIC) bench conditions compared to the 45° (71.9 ± 4.5% MVIC) for the whole concentric contraction. The results of this study support the use of a horizontal bench to achieve muscular activation of both the upper and lower heads of the pectoralis. However, a bench incline angle of 30° or 45° resulted in greater muscular activation during certain time points, suggesting that it is important to consider how muscular activation is affected at various time points when selecting bench press exercises.

Citing Articles

Potential Importance of Maximal Upper Body Strength-Generating Qualities and Upper Body Strength Training for Performance of High-Intensity Running and Jumping Actions: A Scoping Review.

Curovic I, Grecic D, Rhodes D, Alexander J, Harper D Sports (Basel). 2024; 12(12).

PMID: 39728897 PMC: 11679821. DOI: 10.3390/sports12120357.


Front vs Back and Barbell vs Machine Overhead Press: An Electromyographic Analysis and Implications For Resistance Training.

Coratella G, Tornatore G, Longo S, Esposito F, Ce E Front Physiol. 2022; 13:825880.

PMID: 35936912 PMC: 9354811. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.825880.


Chest Exercises: Movement and Loading of Shoulder, Elbow and Wrist Joints.

Schutz P, Zimmer P, Zeidler F, Pluss M, Oberhofer K, List R Sports (Basel). 2022; 10(2).

PMID: 35202059 PMC: 8877248. DOI: 10.3390/sports10020019.


Acute Effects of a Percussive Massage Treatment on Movement Velocity during Resistance Training.

Garcia-Sillero M, Jurado-Castro J, Benitez-Porres J, Vargas-Molina S Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(15).

PMID: 34360032 PMC: 8345385. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18157726.


Effects of Power and Ballistic Training on Table Tennis Players' Electromyography Changes.

Haghighi A, Zaferanieh A, Hosseini-Kakhak S, Maleki A, Esposito F, Ce E Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(15).

PMID: 34360028 PMC: 8345760. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18157735.