» Articles » PMID: 25798546

Pectineal Ligament Hysteropexy for Uterine Prolapse in Premenopausal Women by Open and Laparoscopic Approach in Indian Urban and Rural Centers

Overview
Date 2015 Mar 24
PMID 25798546
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate (a) the surgical outcomes of pectineal ligament hysteropexy (PLH) for uterine prolapse by laparotomy and (b) the feasibility and safety of the procedure by laparoscopic route.

Methods: This is a retrospective consecutive case series of women who underwent PLH from January 1998 to December 2011. The prolapsed uterus was suspended with polyester tape to pectineal ligament on either side through a Cherney incision or laparoscopically at 3 urban and 3 rural hospitals in India.

Results: In 194 women who underwent PLH (176 open and 18 laparoscopic), there were no intraoperative complications. The mean follow-up was 6.5 years (range, 0.5-12 years) for open method and 1 year (range, 0.5-2 years) for laparoscopic approach. There were 46 births in 40 women after the procedure including 32 vaginal and 14 cesarean deliveries. Overall, 10 women (5.1%) had uterine prolapse recurrence; 7 of these occurred after vaginal delivery. One woman had tape erosion into the bladder because of pelvic tuberculosis. At follow-up, 12 women developed cystocele, and 7 women developed portio vaginalis elongation. There were no postoperative enteroceles. Overall reoperation rate was 14.9%. Laparoscopic PLH had minimal morbidity with no recurrence over 2 years.

Conclusions: Open PLH for uterine prolapse may be safely performed and gives durable support to the prolapsed uterus with low recurrence risk.

Citing Articles

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the pelvic organ prolapse and vaginal prolapse among the global population.

Mudalige T, Pathiraja V, Delanerolle G, Cavalini H, Wu S, Taylor J BJUI Compass. 2025; 6(1):e464.

PMID: 39877583 PMC: 11771496. DOI: 10.1002/bco2.464.


Impact of childbirth on pelvic floor dysfunction in women who have undergone previous pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hegde A, Huebner M, Ibrahim S, Mastrolia S, David-Montefiore E, Weintraub A Int Urogynecol J. 2023; 35(1):3-17.

PMID: 37796329 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-023-05630-1.


Surgical anatomy of the pectineal ligament during pectopexy surgery: The relevance to the major vascular structures.

Pulatoglu C, Dogan O, Medisoglu M, Yassa M, Ellibes Kaya A, Selcuk I Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 17(1):21-27.

PMID: 32341826 PMC: 7171544. DOI: 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2020.21284.


Joint report on terminology for surgical procedures to treat pelvic organ prolapse.

Int Urogynecol J. 2020; 31(3):429-463.

PMID: 32040671 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-020-04236-1.


Uterine-preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.

Meriwether K, Balk E, Antosh D, Olivera C, Kim-Fine S, Murphy M Int Urogynecol J. 2019; 30(4):505-522.

PMID: 30741318 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-019-03876-2.