» Articles » PMID: 25798378

Effects of Opium Addiction on Level of Sensory Block in Spinal Anesthesia with Bupivacaine for Lower Abdomen and Limb Surgery: a Case-control Study

Overview
Journal Anesth Pain Med
Publisher Brieflands
Date 2015 Mar 24
PMID 25798378
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In clinical practice, the level of sensory block in spinal anesthesia in opium abusers is lower than that in non-abusers because of adaptive changes caused by opium use.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the level of sensory block resulting from the intrathecal administration of 0.5% bupivacaine in opium abuser patients undergoing lower extremity and lower abdominal surgeries.

Patients And Methods: A total of 100 patients who were candidates of elective lower extremity orthopedic and lower abdominal surgeries were recruited and assigned to two groups based on their history of opium addiction (Case or control). Both groups underwent the same anesthesia procedure and pinprick test was used to assess the level of anesthesia.

Results: No statistically significant difference was observed between groups regarding age, duration of the surgery, and type of surgery. The frequency of addiction was higher in males than in females. The level of sensory block at three minutes was significantly lower in the opium abuser group (P = 0.006). The mean time to achieve T10 sensory block was 10.33 ± 5.79 minutes in the opium abusers and 6.89 ± 3.88 minutes in the controls (P = 0.001). The level of the highest sensory block was lower in the opium abuser group (P = 0.002).

Conclusions: The findings of this study suggested that after induction of spinal anesthesia with intrathecal administration of bupivacaine, chronic opium abusers would have a lower level of sensory block in comparison with patients without a history of opium abuse.

Citing Articles

Comparing Thoracic Epidural Anaesthesia to Rectus Sheath Catheter Analgesia for Postoperative Pain After Major Abdominal Surgeries: A Systematic Review.

Nour H, Elmansi Abdalla H, Abogabal S, Bakhiet A, Magsi A, Sajid M Cureus. 2023; 15(11):e48842.

PMID: 38106748 PMC: 10723107. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.48842.


Rectus sheath block and emergency midline laparotomy at a hospital in Ethiopia: A prospective observational study.

Teshome D, Hunie M, Essa K, Girma S, Fenta E Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021; 68:102572.

PMID: 34336198 PMC: 8318980. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102572.


A Comparison of the Effect of Fractionated and Bolus Dose Injection on Spinal Anesthesia for Lower Limb Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Derakhshan P, Faiz S, Rahimzadeh P, Salehi R, Khaef G Anesth Pain Med. 2021; 10(5):e102228.

PMID: 34150559 PMC: 8207886. DOI: 10.5812/aapm.102228.


Evaluating sedative effects of dexmedetomidine and morphine in the patients with opioid use disorder undergoing cataract surgery.

Moradi Farsani D, Ghadimi K, Abrishamkar R, Montazeri K, Peyman A Am J Clin Exp Immunol. 2021; 10(1):30-36.

PMID: 33815961 PMC: 8012304.


Cerebrospinal Fluid and Spinal Anesthesia Parameters in Healthy Individuals versus Opium-addict Patients during Lower Limb Surgery.

Derakhshan P, Imani F, Seyed-Siamdoust S, Garousi S, Nouri N Addict Health. 2020; 12(1):11-17.

PMID: 32582410 PMC: 7291896. DOI: 10.22122/ahj.v12i1.257.


References
1.
Holman S, Robinson R, Beardsley D, Stewart S, Klein L, Stevens R . Hyperbaric dye solution distribution characteristics after pencil-point needle injection in a spinal cord model. Anesthesiology. 1997; 86(4):966-73. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199704000-00027. View

2.
Szeto H, Soong Y, Wu D, Qian X, Zhao G . Endogenous opioid peptides contribute to antinociceptive potency of intrathecal [Dmt1]DALDA. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2003; 305(2):696-702. DOI: 10.1124/jpet.102.048561. View

3.
Marchand F, Ardid D, Chapuy E, Alloui A, Jourdan D, Eschalier A . Evidence for an involvement of supraspinal delta- and spinal mu-opioid receptors in the antihyperalgesic effect of chronically administered clomipramine in mononeuropathic rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2003; 307(1):268-74. DOI: 10.1124/jpet.103.052613. View

4.
Chen S, Pan H . Antinociceptive effect of morphine, but not mu opioid receptor number, is attenuated in the spinal cord of diabetic rats. Anesthesiology. 2003; 99(6):1409-14. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200312000-00026. View

5.
Ossipov M, Lai J, King T, Vanderah T, Philip Malan Jr T, Hruby V . Antinociceptive and nociceptive actions of opioids. J Neurobiol. 2004; 61(1):126-48. DOI: 10.1002/neu.20091. View