Phase II Trial of Weekly Nab-paclitaxel and Carboplatin Treatment with or Without Trastuzumab As Nonanthracycline Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer
Overview
Affiliations
Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has become standard treatment for women with locally advanced breast cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) versus paclitaxel combined with carboplatin.
Methods: Thirty patients were treated with neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m(2), days 1, 8, and 15) and carboplatin (area under the curve =2; days 1, 8, and 15) every 21 days for four cycles. Ninety matched patients received paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2), days 1, 8, and 15) and carboplatin every 21 days for four cycles. Weekly trastuzumab is recommended for overexpression of human epidermal receptor-2. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (defined as ypT0/is ypN0). Matching was conducted according to six variables: body mass index, clinical tumor stage, clinical lymph node status, estrogen receptor status, HER2 status, and trastuzumab receiving rate.
Results: Ninety percent of patients in the nab-paclitaxel group and 80% of patients in the paclitaxel group experienced a clinical objective response (complete response or partial response; P=0.450). Eight patients in the nab-paclitaxel group and 23 patients in the paclitaxel group had a pathologic complete response in the breast and axillary nodes (26.7% versus 25.6%; P=0.904). Nab-paclitaxel showed a beneficial effective trend on clinical tumor stage II (36.8% versus 15.8%; P=0.051). When trastuzumab was added to nab-paclitaxel, the pathologic complete response rate was not significantly improved more than with trastuzumab and paclitaxel (43.6% versus 39.6%; P=0.769). Carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel or paclitaxel had similarly low pathologic complete response rates (7.7% versus 10.5%) for the luminal molecular subtype. One (50%) triple-negative patient achieved a pathologic complete response. The nab-paclitaxel regimen caused more grade 4 neutropenia than the paclitaxel regimen (56.7% versus 21.1%; P<0.001).
Conclusion: Our study shows that weekly nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin with or without trastuzumab resulted in a pathologic complete response rate that was not superior to the matched cohorts. Future, larger trials are needed to validate that nab-paclitaxel is beneficial for clinical tumor stage II and the triple-negative subgroup.
Bahrin N, Matusin S, Mustapa A, Huat L, Perera S, Hamid M Syst Rev. 2024; 13(1):100.
PMID: 38576013 PMC: 10993489. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02520-5.
Li H, Wang W, Wang Z Am J Transl Res. 2023; 15(6):4279-4290.
PMID: 37434856 PMC: 10331690.
Gong Y, Zuo H, Zhou Y, Yu K, Liu G, Di G Ann Transl Med. 2023; 11(6):243.
PMID: 37082658 PMC: 10113104. DOI: 10.21037/atm-22-4093.
Freedman R, Li T, Sedrak M, Hopkins J, Tayob N, Faggen M J Geriatr Oncol. 2022; 14(1):101377.
PMID: 36163163 PMC: 10080267. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.09.006.
Xie Y, Wu S, Zhang Y, Li J, Mo M, Shao Z Front Oncol. 2021; 11:686591.
PMID: 34168999 PMC: 8217668. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.686591.