» Articles » PMID: 25791395

Web-based Self-reported Height, Weight, and Body Mass Index Among Swedish Adolescents: a Validation Study

Overview
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2015 Mar 21
PMID 25791395
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Web-collected height and weight are increasingly used in epidemiological studies; however, the validity has rarely been evaluated.

Objective: The aim of the study was to validate self-reported height, weight, and corresponding body mass index (BMI) among Swedish adolescents aged approximately 16 years. A secondary aim was to investigate possible prediction factors for validity of self-reported BMI.

Methods: The study included 1698 adolescents from the population-based cohort BAMSE. Height and weight were collected through a Web-based questionnaire and subsequently measured using standard procedures. Differences between reported and measured height, weight, and corresponding BMI were compared by t tests and agreement was evaluated by Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman plots. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to investigate whether lifestyle and demographic factors predicted validity of self-reported BMI.

Results: On average, weight was underestimated by 1.1 kg and height was overestimated by 0.5 cm, leading to an underestimation of BMI by 0.5 kg/m2. Correlation coefficients were .98 for height, .97 for weight, and .94 for BMI, and highly significant. Females underestimated weight to a higher extent than males and overweight and obese participants underestimated weight to a higher extent than normal-weight participants, which resulted in higher underestimation of BMI. Underweight participants, on the contrary, overestimated weight and correspondingly BMI. Overall, a high proportion of participants were classified into the correct BMI category; however, among overweight and obese participants, only 60.2% (139/231) and 46% (20/44) were correctly classified, respectively. In the multivariable prediction model, only gender and BMI status significantly predicted discrepancy between reported and measured BMI.

Conclusions: Web-collected BMI may be used as a valid, quick, and cost-effective alternative to measured BMI among Swedish adolescents. The accuracy of self-reported BMI declines with increasing BMI and self-reported BMI should not be used to estimate the prevalence of overweight or obesity.

Citing Articles

Somatization and Body Composition: Findings from a Cross-Sectional Study on Non-Clinical Young Adults.

Baranauskas M, Kupciunaite I, Lieponiene J, Stukas R Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 13(3).

PMID: 39942492 PMC: 11816891. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13030304.


Twelve-month analysis of real-world evidence from a telehealth obesity-treatment provider using antiobesity medications.

Ard J, Hong Y, Foster G, Medcalf A, Nadolsky S, Cardel M Obesity (Silver Spring). 2024; 32(12):2246-2254.

PMID: 39478294 PMC: 11589532. DOI: 10.1002/oby.24169.


Validity of self-reported weight and height among female young adults in the United Arab Emirates.

Haroun D, Ehsanallah A PLoS One. 2024; 19(4):e0302439.

PMID: 38635733 PMC: 11025931. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302439.


Sports Practice, Body Image Perception, and Factors Involved in Sporting Activity in Italian Schoolchildren.

Zaccagni L, Rosa L, Toselli S, Gualdi-Russo E Children (Basel). 2023; 10(12).

PMID: 38136052 PMC: 10742091. DOI: 10.3390/children10121850.


Agreement between measured weight, height and BMI and Web-based self-reported data in participants of the 1993 Pelotas Birth Cohort, Brazil: a cross-sectional validation study.

Botelho V, Barros A, Oliveira R, Martins R, Goncalves H, Menezes A Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2023; 32(2):e2022590.

PMID: 37531484 PMC: 10379011. DOI: 10.1590/S2237-96222023000200013.


References
1.
Clarke P, Sastry N, Duffy D, Ailshire J . Accuracy of self-reported versus measured weight over adolescence and young adulthood: findings from the national longitudinal study of adolescent health, 1996-2008. Am J Epidemiol. 2014; 180(2):153-9. PMC: 4082345. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwu133. View

2.
Nyholm M, Gullberg B, Merlo J, Lundqvist-Persson C, Rastam L, Lindblad U . The validity of obesity based on self-reported weight and height: Implications for population studies. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007; 15(1):197-208. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2007.536. View

3.
Dahl A, Hassing L, Fransson E, Pedersen N . Agreement between self-reported and measured height, weight and body mass index in old age--a longitudinal study with 20 years of follow-up. Age Ageing. 2010; 39(4):445-51. PMC: 2899942. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afq038. View

4.
Storey K, McCargar L . Reliability and validity of Web-SPAN, a web-based method for assessing weight status, diet and physical activity in youth. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2011; 25(1):59-68. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2011.01181.x. View

5.
Cole T, Bellizzi M, Flegal K, Dietz W . Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ. 2000; 320(7244):1240-3. PMC: 27365. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1240. View