» Articles » PMID: 25790172

Influence of Probe Flexibility and Gelatin Embedding on Neuronal Density and Glial Responses to Brain Implants

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 Mar 20
PMID 25790172
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To develop long-term high quality communication between brain and computer, a key issue is how to reduce the adverse foreign body responses. Here, the impact of probe flexibility and gelatine embedding on long-term (6w) tissue responses, was analyzed. Probes of same polymer material, size and shape, flexible mainly in one direction, were implanted in rat cerebral cortex (nimplants = 3 x 8) in two orientations with respect to the major movement direction of the brain relative to the skull: parallel to (flex mode) or transverse to (rigid mode). Flex mode implants were either embedded in gelatin or non-embedded. Neurons, activated microglia and astrocytes were visualized using immunohistochemistry. The astrocytic reactivity, but not microglial response, was significantly lower to probes implanted in flex mode as compared to rigid mode. The microglial response, but not astrocytic reactivity, was significantly smaller to gelatin embedded probes (flex mode) than non-embedded. Interestingly, the neuronal density was preserved in the inner zone surrounding gelatin embedded probes. This contrasts to the common reports of reduced neuronal density close to implanted probes. In conclusion, sheer stress appears to be an important factor for astrocytic reactivity to implanted probes. Moreover, gelatin embedding can improve the neuronal density and reduce the microglial response close to the probe.

Citing Articles

Polydimethylsiloxane as a more biocompatible alternative to glass in optogenetics.

Andersen M, Schouenborg J Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):16090.

PMID: 37752160 PMC: 10522705. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-43297-2.


Commonly Overlooked Factors in Biocompatibility Studies of Neural Implants.

Kumosa L Adv Sci (Weinh). 2023; 10(6):e2205095.

PMID: 36596702 PMC: 9951391. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202205095.


3D Bioelectronics with a Remodellable Matrix for Long-Term Tissue Integration and Recording.

Boys A, Carnicer-Lombarte A, Guemes-Gonzalez A, van Niekerk D, Hilton S, Barone D Adv Mater. 2022; 35(8):e2207847.

PMID: 36458737 PMC: 11475589. DOI: 10.1002/adma.202207847.


Microelectrode implants, inflammatory response and long-lasting effects on NADPH diaphorase neurons in the rat frontal cortex.

Guimaraes J, Lemos N, Freire M, Pereira A, Ribeiro S Exp Brain Res. 2022; 240(10):2569-2580.

PMID: 35947168 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-022-06434-3.


Controlled assembly of retinal cells on fractal and Euclidean electrodes.

Moslehi S, Rowland C, Smith J, Watterson W, Miller D, Niell C PLoS One. 2022; 17(4):e0265685.

PMID: 35385490 PMC: 8985931. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265685.


References
1.
Neary J, Kang Y, Willoughby K, Ellis E . Activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase by stretch-induced injury in astrocytes involves extracellular ATP and P2 purinergic receptors. J Neurosci. 2003; 23(6):2348-56. PMC: 6742014. View

2.
Kim T, Branner A, Gulati T, Giszter S . Braided multi-electrode probes: mechanical compliance characteristics and recordings from spinal cords. J Neural Eng. 2013; 10(4):045001. PMC: 3723769. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/10/4/045001. View

3.
Ejserholm F, Kohler P, Granmo M, Schouenborg J, Bengtsson M, Wallman L . μ-Foil Polymer Electrode Array for Intracortical Neural Recordings. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2016; 2:1500207. PMC: 4848100. DOI: 10.1109/JTEHM.2014.2326859. View

4.
Edell D, Toi V, McNeil V, CLARK L . Factors influencing the biocompatibility of insertable silicon microshafts in cerebral cortex. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1992; 39(6):635-43. DOI: 10.1109/10.141202. View

5.
Ward M, Rajdev P, Ellison C, Irazoqui P . Toward a comparison of microelectrodes for acute and chronic recordings. Brain Res. 2009; 1282:183-200. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.052. View