» Articles » PMID: 25789848

Spinal Neuronal Activation During Locomotor-like Activity Enabled by Epidural Stimulation and 5-hydroxytryptamine Agonists in Spinal Rats

Overview
Journal J Neurosci Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2015 Mar 20
PMID 25789848
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: The neural networks that generate stepping in complete spinal adult rats remain poorly defined. To address this problem, we used c-fos (an activity-dependent marker) to identify active interneurons and motoneurons in the lumbar spinal cord of adult spinal rats during a 30-min bout of bipedal stepping. Spinal rats were either step trained (30 min/day, 3 days/week, for 7.5 weeks) or not step trained. Stepping was enabled by epidural stimulation and the administration of the serotonergic agonists quipazine and 8-OHDPAT. A third group of spinal rats served as untreated (no stimulation, drugs, or stepping) controls. The numbers of activated cholinergic central canal cluster cells and partition neurons were higher in both step-trained and nontrained rats than in untreated rats and were higher in nontrained than in step-trained rats. The latter finding suggests that daily treatment with epidural stimulation plus serotonergic agonist treatment without step training enhances the excitability of a broader cholinergic interneuronal population than does step training. The numbers of activated interneurons in laminae II-VI of lumbar cross-sections were higher in both step-trained and nontrained rats than in untreated rats, and they were highest in step-trained rats. This finding suggests that this population of interneurons is responsive to epidural stimulation plus serotonergic treatment and that load-bearing induced when stepping has an additive effect. The numbers of activated motoneurons of all size categories were higher in the step-trained group than in the other two groups, reflecting a strong effect of loading on motoneuron recruitment. In general, these results indicate that the spinal networks for locomotion are similar with and without brain input.

Significance: We identified neurons within the spinal cord networks that are activated during assisted stepping in paraplegic rats. We stimulated the spinal cord and administered a drug to help the rats step. One group was trained to step and another was not trained. We observed a lower percentage of activated neurons in specific spinal cord regions in trained rats than in nontrained rats after a 1-hr stepping bout, suggesting that step training reduces activation of some types of spinal neurons. This observation indicates that training makes the spinal networks more efficient and suggests a "learning" phenomenon in the spinal cord without any brain input.

Citing Articles

A fresh look at propriospinal interneurons plasticity and intraspinal circuits remodeling after spinal cord injury.

Cheng J, Guan N IBRO Neurosci Rep. 2023; 14:441-446.

PMID: 37388491 PMC: 10300475. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibneur.2023.04.001.


Closed-Loop, Cervical, Epidural Stimulation Elicits Respiratory Neuroplasticity after Spinal Cord Injury in Freely Behaving Rats.

Malone I, Kelly M, Nosacka R, Nash M, Yue S, Xue W eNeuro. 2022; 9(1).

PMID: 35058311 PMC: 8856702. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0426-21.2021.


Electrical epidural stimulation of the cervical spinal cord: implications for spinal respiratory neuroplasticity after spinal cord injury.

Malone I, Nosacka R, Nash M, Otto K, Dale E J Neurophysiol. 2021; 126(2):607-626.

PMID: 34232771 PMC: 8409953. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00625.2020.


Spinal Cord Injury Alters Spinal Shox2 Interneurons by Enhancing Excitatory Synaptic Input and Serotonergic Modulation While Maintaining Intrinsic Properties in Mouse.

Garcia-Ramirez D, Ha N, Bibu S, Stachowski N, Dougherty K J Neurosci. 2021; 41(27):5833-5848.

PMID: 34006587 PMC: 8265802. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1576-20.2021.


Propriospinal Neurons: Essential Elements of Locomotor Control in the Intact and Possibly the Injured Spinal Cord.

Laliberte A, Goltash S, Lalonde N, Bui T Front Cell Neurosci. 2019; 13:512.

PMID: 31798419 PMC: 6874159. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00512.


References
1.
Rossignol S, Frigon A . Recovery of locomotion after spinal cord injury: some facts and mechanisms. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2011; 34:413-40. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113746. View

2.
Fink A, Croce K, Huang Z, Abbott L, Jessell T, Azim E . Presynaptic inhibition of spinal sensory feedback ensures smooth movement. Nature. 2014; 509(7498):43-8. PMC: 4292914. DOI: 10.1038/nature13276. View

3.
Witts E, Zagoraiou L, Miles G . Anatomy and function of cholinergic C bouton inputs to motor neurons. J Anat. 2013; 224(1):52-60. PMC: 3867887. DOI: 10.1111/joa.12063. View

4.
Gad P, Choe J, Shah P, Garcia-Alias G, Rath M, Gerasimenko Y . Sub-threshold spinal cord stimulation facilitates spontaneous motor activity in spinal rats. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013; 10:108. PMC: 4016220. DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-10-108. View

5.
Honda C, Lee C . Immunohistochemistry of synaptic input and functional characterizations of neurons near the spinal central canal. Brain Res. 1985; 343(1):120-8. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(85)91165-5. View