» Articles » PMID: 25787220

Remediation of Nitrate-contaminated Water by Solid-phase Denitrification Process-a Review

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2015 Mar 20
PMID 25787220
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The paper presents a compilation of various autotrophic and heterotrophic ways of solid-phase denitrification. It covers a complete understanding of various pathways followed during denitrification process. The paper gives a brief review on various governing factors on which the process depends. It focuses mainly on the solid-phase denitrification process, its applicability, efficiency, and disadvantages associated. It presents a critical review on various methodologies associated with denitrification process reported in past years. A comparative study has also been carried out to have a better understanding of advantages and disadvantages of a particular method. We summarize the various organic and inorganic substances and various techniques that have been used for enhancing denitrification process and suggest possible gaps in the research areas whi'ch are worthy of future research.

Citing Articles

Advance in the sulfur-based electron donor autotrophic denitrification for nitrate nitrogen removal from wastewater.

Shao L, Wang D, Chen G, Zhao X, Fan L World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2023; 40(1):7.

PMID: 37938419 DOI: 10.1007/s11274-023-03802-1.


Improved Denitrification Performance of Polybutylene Succinate/Corncob Composite Carbon Source by Proper Pretreatment: Performance, Functional Genes and Microbial Community Structure.

Yang Z, Lou Y, Pan H, Wang H, Yang Q, Zhuge Y Polymers (Basel). 2023; 15(4).

PMID: 36850087 PMC: 9958998. DOI: 10.3390/polym15040801.


Duckweeds for Phytoremediation of Polluted Water.

Zhou Y, Stepanenko A, Kishchenko O, Xu J, Borisjuk N Plants (Basel). 2023; 12(3).

PMID: 36771672 PMC: 9919746. DOI: 10.3390/plants12030589.


Pyrite-Based Autotrophic Denitrifying Microorganisms Derived from Paddy Soils: Effects of Organic Co-Substrate Addition.

Xu B, Yang X, Li Y, Yang K, Xiong Y, Yuan N Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(18).

PMID: 36142037 PMC: 9517464. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191811763.


Potential biofilm control strategies for extended spaceflight missions.

Zea L, McLean R, Rook T, Angle G, Carter D, Delegard A Biofilm. 2021; 2:100026.

PMID: 33447811 PMC: 7798464. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioflm.2020.100026.


References
1.
Vogel T . Bioaugmentation as a soil bioremediation approach. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1996; 7(3):311-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0958-1669(96)80036-x. View

2.
Bernot M, Dodds W, Gardner W, McCarthy M, Sobolev D, Tank J . Comparing denitrification estimates for a Texas estuary by using acetylene inhibition and membrane inlet mass spectrometry. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003; 69(10):5950-6. PMC: 201219. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.10.5950-5956.2003. View

3.
Nakajima-Kambe T, Okada N, Takeda M, Akutsu-Shigeno Y, Matsumura M, Nomura N . Screening of novel cellulose-degrading bacterium and its application to denitrification of groundwater. J Biosci Bioeng. 2005; 99(4):429-33. DOI: 10.1263/jbb.99.429. View

4.
Trois C, Pisano G, Oxarango L . Alternative solutions for the bio-denitrification of landfill leachates using pine bark and compost. J Hazard Mater. 2010; 178(1-3):1100-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.01.054. View

5.
Smith R, Duff J . Denitrification in a sand and gravel aquifer. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988; 54(5):1071-8. PMC: 202605. DOI: 10.1128/aem.54.5.1071-1078.1988. View