» Articles » PMID: 25784645

The Nature of Individual Differences in Inhibited Temperament and Risk for Psychiatric Disease: A Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Prog Neurobiol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2015 Mar 19
PMID 25784645
Citations 43
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

What makes us different from one another? Why does one person jump out of airplanes for fun while another prefers to stay home and read? Why are some babies born with a predisposition to become anxious? Questions about individual differences in temperament have engaged the minds of scientists, psychologists, and philosophers for centuries. Recent technological advances in neuroimaging and genetics provide an unprecedented opportunity to answer these questions. Here we review the literature on the neurobiology of one of the most basic individual differences-the tendency to approach or avoid novelty. This trait, called inhibited temperament, is innate, heritable, and observed across species. Importantly, inhibited temperament also confers risk for psychiatric disease. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of inhibited temperament, including neuroimaging and genetic studies in human and non-human primates. We conducted a meta-analysis of neuroimaging findings in inhibited humans that points to alterations in a fronto-limbic-basal ganglia circuit; these findings provide the basis of a model of inhibited temperament neurocircuitry. Lesion and neuroimaging studies in non-human primate models of inhibited temperament highlight roles for the amygdala, hippocampus, orbitofrontal cortex, and dorsal prefrontal cortex. Genetic studies highlight a role for genes that regulate neurotransmitter function, such as the serotonin transporter polymorphisms (5-HTTLPR), as well as genes that regulate stress response, such as corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH). Together these studies provide a foundation of knowledge about the genetic and neural substrates of this most basic of temperament traits. Future studies using novel imaging methods and genetic approaches promise to expand upon these biological bases of inhibited temperament and inform our understanding of risk for psychiatric disease.

Citing Articles

Four distinct peer interaction variables as moderators of the fearful temperament-anxiety association, using data from the Generation R Study.

Harrewijn A, Mulder R, van IJzendoorn M, Wieser M, Jansen P JCPP Adv. 2025; 5(1):e12254.

PMID: 40059994 PMC: 11889650. DOI: 10.1002/jcv2.12254.


Behavior and emotion regulation of socially inhibited individuals in uncomfortable social situations: A mixed methods study.

Duijndam S, Karreman A, de Smet M, Kupper N Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2025; 24(4):100532.

PMID: 39759573 PMC: 11699201. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100532.


Linking Striatal Dopaminergic Asymmetry with Personality Traits: Insights from Gambling Disorder.

Di Carlo F, Pettorruso M, Santorelli M, Cocciolillo F, dAndrea G, Di Nicola M J Gambl Stud. 2024; 40(4):2189-2200.

PMID: 38755422 PMC: 11557681. DOI: 10.1007/s10899-024-10311-9.


Early-Life Temperamental Differences as Longitudinal Predictors of Unintentional Injuries.

Ksinan A, Dalecka A, Kukla L, Pikhart H, Bobak M J Pediatr Psychol. 2023; 49(1):35-44.

PMID: 37847645 PMC: 10799721. DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsad072.


Modeling the normal:abnormal spectrum of early childhood internalizing behaviors: A clinical-developmental approach for the Multidimensional Assessment Profiles Internalizing Dimensions.

Wakschlag L, Sherlock P, Blackwell C, Burns J, Krogh-Jespersen S, Gershon R Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2023; 32(S1):e1987.

PMID: 37814600 PMC: 10654833. DOI: 10.1002/mpr.1987.


References
1.
Honey C, Sporns O, Cammoun L, Gigandet X, Thiran J, Meuli R . Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(6):2035-40. PMC: 2634800. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0811168106. View

2.
Fox A, Oler J, Shelton S, Nanda S, Davidson R, Roseboom P . Central amygdala nucleus (Ce) gene expression linked to increased trait-like Ce metabolism and anxious temperament in young primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109(44):18108-13. PMC: 3497741. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1206723109. View

3.
Kang H, Schuman E . Neurotrophin-induced modulation of synaptic transmission in the adult hippocampus. J Physiol Paris. 1995; 89(1):11-22. DOI: 10.1016/0928-4257(96)80547-x. View

4.
Schwartz C, Kunwar P, Greve D, Moran L, Viner J, Covino J . Structural differences in adult orbital and ventromedial prefrontal cortex predicted by infant temperament at 4 months of age. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010; 67(1):78-84. PMC: 2811077. DOI: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.171. View

5.
Alheid G, Heimer L . New perspectives in basal forebrain organization of special relevance for neuropsychiatric disorders: the striatopallidal, amygdaloid, and corticopetal components of substantia innominata. Neuroscience. 1988; 27(1):1-39. DOI: 10.1016/0306-4522(88)90217-5. View