» Articles » PMID: 25783428

Development and Validation of Risk Prediction Algorithms to Estimate Future Risk of Common Cancers in Men and Women: Prospective Cohort Study

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2015 Mar 19
PMID 25783428
Citations 79
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To derive and validate a set of clinical risk prediction algorithm to estimate the 10-year risk of 11 common cancers.

Design: Prospective open cohort study using routinely collected data from 753 QResearch general practices in England. We used 565 practices to develop the scores and 188 for validation.

Subjects: 4.96 million patients aged 25-84 years in the derivation cohort; 1.64 million in the validation cohort. Patients were free of the relevant cancer at baseline.

Methods: Cox proportional hazards models in the derivation cohort to derive 10-year risk algorithms. Risk factors considered included age, ethnicity, deprivation, body mass index, smoking, alcohol, previous cancer diagnoses, family history of cancer, relevant comorbidities and medication. Measures of calibration and discrimination in the validation cohort.

Outcomes: Incident cases of blood, breast, bowel, gastro-oesophageal, lung, oral, ovarian, pancreas, prostate, renal tract and uterine cancers. Cancers were recorded on any one of four linked data sources (general practitioner (GP), mortality, hospital or cancer records).

Results: We identified 228,241 incident cases during follow-up of the 11 types of cancer. Of these 25,444 were blood; 41,315 breast; 32,626 bowel, 12,808 gastro-oesophageal; 32,187 lung; 4811 oral; 6635 ovarian; 7119 pancreatic; 35,256 prostate; 23,091 renal tract; 6949 uterine cancers. The lung cancer algorithm had the best performance with an R(2) of 64.2%; D statistic of 2.74; receiver operating characteristic curve statistic of 0.91 in women. The sensitivity for the top 10% of women at highest risk of lung cancer was 67%. Performance of the algorithms in men was very similar to that for women.

Conclusions: We have developed and validated a prediction models to quantify absolute risk of 11 common cancers. They can be used to identify patients at high risk of cancers for prevention or further assessment. The algorithms could be integrated into clinical computer systems and used to identify high-risk patients.

Web Calculator: There is a simple web calculator to implement the Qcancer 10 year risk algorithm together with the open source software for download (available at http://qcancer.org/10yr/).

Citing Articles

Predictive performance of risk prediction models for lung cancer incidence in Western and Asian countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Juang Y, Ang L, Seow W Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4259.

PMID: 40038330 PMC: 11880538. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-83875-6.


Models for predicting risk of endometrial cancer: a systematic review.

Forder B, Ardasheva A, Atha K, Nentwich H, Abhari R, Kartsonaki C Diagn Progn Res. 2025; 9(1):3.

PMID: 39901248 PMC: 11792366. DOI: 10.1186/s41512-024-00178-0.


Alcoholic beverage consumption and female breast cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.

Sohi I, Rehm J, Saab M, Virmani L, Franklin A, Sanchez G Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2024; 48(12):2222-2241.

PMID: 39581746 PMC: 11629438. DOI: 10.1111/acer.15493.


ASSIGN score and cancer risk in the Scottish Heart Health Extended Cohort (SHHEC) study.

Fitton C, Woodward M, Belch J BJC Rep. 2024; 2(1):75.

PMID: 39516549 PMC: 11523964. DOI: 10.1038/s44276-024-00102-5.


Plasma proteomic and polygenic profiling improve risk stratification and personalized screening for colorectal cancer.

Sun J, Liu Y, Zhao J, Lu B, Zhou S, Lu W Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):8873.

PMID: 39402035 PMC: 11473805. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-52894-2.


References
1.
Collins G, Altman D . An independent external validation and evaluation of QRISK cardiovascular risk prediction: a prospective open cohort study. BMJ. 2009; 339:b2584. PMC: 2714681. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b2584. View

2.
Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C . Derivation and validation of updated QFracture algorithm to predict risk of osteoporotic fracture in primary care in the United Kingdom: prospective open cohort study. BMJ. 2012; 344:e3427. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e3427. View

3.
Shimoyama S . Diabetes mellitus carries a risk of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2013; 19(40):6902-10. PMC: 3812492. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i40.6902. View

4.
Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C . Identifying patients with suspected colorectal cancer in primary care: derivation and validation of an algorithm. Br J Gen Pract. 2012; 62(594):e29-37. PMC: 3252537. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp12X616346. View

5.
Luo W, Cao Y, Liao C, Gao F . Diabetes mellitus and the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of 24 cohort studies. Colorectal Dis. 2012; 14(11):1307-12. DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02875.x. View