» Articles » PMID: 25782669

Non-invasive Prenatal Testing for Aneuploidy and Beyond: Challenges of Responsible Innovation in Prenatal Screening

Abstract

This paper contains a joint ESHG/ASHG position document with recommendations regarding responsible innovation in prenatal screening with non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). By virtue of its greater accuracy and safety with respect to prenatal screening for common autosomal aneuploidies, NIPT has the potential of helping the practice better achieve its aim of facilitating autonomous reproductive choices, provided that balanced pretest information and non-directive counseling are available as part of the screening offer. Depending on the health-care setting, different scenarios for NIPT-based screening for common autosomal aneuploidies are possible. The trade-offs involved in these scenarios should be assessed in light of the aim of screening, the balance of benefits and burdens for pregnant women and their partners and considerations of cost-effectiveness and justice. With improving screening technologies and decreasing costs of sequencing and analysis, it will become possible in the near future to significantly expand the scope of prenatal screening beyond common autosomal aneuploidies. Commercial providers have already begun expanding their tests to include sex-chromosomal abnormalities and microdeletions. However, multiple false positives may undermine the main achievement of NIPT in the context of prenatal screening: the significant reduction of the invasive testing rate. This document argues for a cautious expansion of the scope of prenatal screening to serious congenital and childhood disorders, only following sound validation studies and a comprehensive evaluation of all relevant aspects. A further core message of this document is that in countries where prenatal screening is offered as a public health programme, governments and public health authorities should adopt an active role to ensure the responsible innovation of prenatal screening on the basis of ethical principles. Crucial elements are the quality of the screening process as a whole (including non-laboratory aspects such as information and counseling), education of professionals, systematic evaluation of all aspects of prenatal screening, development of better evaluation tools in the light of the aim of the practice, accountability to all stakeholders including children born from screened pregnancies and persons living with the conditions targeted in prenatal screening and promotion of equity of access.

Citing Articles

Understanding Genetic Screening: Harnessing Health Information to Prevent Disease Risks.

Lee C, Chuang C, Chiu H, Chang Y, Tu Y, Lo Y Int J Med Sci. 2025; 22(4):903-919.

PMID: 39991772 PMC: 11843151. DOI: 10.7150/ijms.101219.


Blazing the Trail of Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening Expanded Use: Healthcare Providers' Perspectives.

Laforce T, Laberge A, Malo M, Ravitsky V Prenat Diagn. 2025; 45(2):163-170.

PMID: 39763198 PMC: 11790517. DOI: 10.1002/pd.6738.


Towards responsible ctDNA-based multi-cancer screening: a preliminary exploration and discussion of ethically relevant aspects.

Dondorp W, de Wert G Extracell Vesicles Circ Nucl Acids. 2024; 3(3):235-243.

PMID: 39697487 PMC: 11648474. DOI: 10.20517/evcna.2022.23.


SCAN: a nanopore-based, cost effective decision-supporting tool for mass screening of aneuploidies.

Schack A, Garrido-Navas M, Galevski D, Madjarov G, Krych L Hum Genomics. 2024; 18(1):131.

PMID: 39578906 PMC: 11583562. DOI: 10.1186/s40246-024-00690-w.


Factors influencing pregnant women's decision to accept or decline prenatal screening and diagnosis - a qualitative study.

Ternby E, Axelsson O, Ingvoldstad Malmgren C, Georgsson S J Community Genet. 2024; 15(6):711-721.

PMID: 39485622 PMC: 11645329. DOI: 10.1007/s12687-024-00746-3.


References
1.
Skirton H, Jackson L, Goldsmith L, OConnor A . Are health professionals ready for direct-to-consumer genetic and genomic testing?. Per Med. 2018; 10(7):673-682. DOI: 10.2217/pme.13.71. View

2.
van den Heuvel A, Chitty L, Dormandy E, Newson A, Deans Z, Attwood S . Will the introduction of non-invasive prenatal diagnostic testing erode informed choices? An experimental study of health care professionals. Patient Educ Couns. 2009; 78(1):24-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.05.014. View

3.
Mersy E, Smits L, van Winden L, de Die-Smulders C, Paulussen A, Macville M . Noninvasive detection of fetal trisomy 21: systematic review and report of quality and outcomes of diagnostic accuracy studies performed between 1997 and 2012. Hum Reprod Update. 2013; 19(4):318-29. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmt001. View

4.
Donley G, Hull S, Berkman B . Prenatal whole genome sequencing: just because we can, should we?. Hastings Cent Rep. 2012; 42(4):28-40. PMC: 4113095. DOI: 10.1002/hast.50. View

5.
Benn P, Borrell A, Cuckle H, Dugoff L, Gross S, Johnson J . Prenatal Detection of Down Syndrome using Massively Parallel Sequencing (MPS): a rapid response statement from a committee on behalf of the Board of the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis, 24 October 2011. Prenat Diagn. 2012; 32(1):1-2. DOI: 10.1002/pd.2919. View