» Articles » PMID: 25774677

How Much Does It Cost to Improve Access to Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision Among High-risk, Low-income Communities in Uganda?

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 Mar 17
PMID 25774677
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The Ugandan Ministry of Health has endorsed voluntary medical male circumcision as an HIV prevention strategy and has set ambitious goals (e.g., 4.2 million circumcisions by 2015). Innovative strategies to improve access for hard to reach, high risk, and poor populations are essential for reaching such goals. In 2009, the Makerere University Walter Reed Project began the first facility-based VMMC program in Uganda in a non-research setting. In addition, a mobile clinic began providing VMMC services to more remote, rural locations in 2011. The primary objective of this study was to estimate the average cost of performing VMMCs in the mobile clinic compared to those performed in health facilities (fixed sites). The difference between such costs is the cost of improving access to VMMC.

Methods: A micro-costing approach was used to estimate costs from the service provider's perspective of a circumcision. Supply chain and higher-level program support costs are not included.

Results: The average cost (US$2012) of resources used per circumcision was $61 in the mobile program ($72 for more remote locations) compared to $34 at the fixed site. Costs for community mobilization, HIV testing, the initial medical exam, and staff for performing VMMC operations were similar for both programs. The cost of disposable surgical kits, the additional upfront cost for the mobile clinic, and additional costs for staff drive the differences in costs between the two programs. Cost estimates are relatively insensitive to patient flow over time.

Conclusion: The MUWRP VMMC program improves access for hard to reach, relatively poor, and high-risk rural populations for a cost of $27-$38 per VMMC. Costs to patients to access services are almost certainly less in the mobile program, by reducing out-of-pocket travel expenses and lost time and associated income, all of which have been shown to be barriers for accessing treatment.

Citing Articles

Cost comparison of a rapid results initiative against standard clinic-based model to scale-up voluntary medical male circumcision in Kenya.

Jaradeh K, Van Fleet Kingery T, Cheruiyot J, Odhiambo F, Bukusi E, Cohen C PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023; 3(3):e0000817.

PMID: 36989245 PMC: 10057778. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000817.


Attaining 95-95-95 through Implementation Science: 15 Years of Insights and Best Practices from the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research's Implementation of the U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief.

Lee E, Ganesan K, Khamadi S, Meribe S, Njeru D, Adamu Y Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020; 104(1):12-25.

PMID: 33241783 PMC: 7790083. DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0541.


Service delivery interventions to increase uptake of voluntary medical male circumcision for HIV prevention: A systematic review.

Atkins K, Yeh P, Kennedy C, Fonner V, Sweat M, OReilly K PLoS One. 2020; 15(1):e0227755.

PMID: 31929587 PMC: 6957297. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227755.


Voluntary medical male circumcision service delivery in South Africa: The economic costs and potential opportunity for private sector involvement.

Tchuenche M, Njeuhmeli E, Schutte C, Ngubeni L, Choge I, Martin E PLoS One. 2018; 13(12):e0208698.

PMID: 30557330 PMC: 6296535. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208698.


Cost and cost-effectiveness of voluntary medical male circumcision in street-connected youth: findings from an education-based pilot intervention in Eldoret, Kenya.

Galarraga O, Shah P, Wilson-Barthes M, Ayuku D, Braitstein P AIDS Res Ther. 2018; 15(1):24.

PMID: 30497481 PMC: 6264043. DOI: 10.1186/s12981-018-0207-x.


References
1.
Thirumurthy H, Masters S, Rao S, Bronson M, Lanham M, Omanga E . Effect of providing conditional economic compensation on uptake of voluntary medical male circumcision in Kenya: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014; 312(7):703-11. PMC: 4268484. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.9087. View

2.
Booker C . Male circumcision cost-effective articles ignore methodological problems and ethical concerns. JAMA Pediatr. 2013; 167(2):198-9. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.832. View

3.
Kacker S, Frick K, Gaydos C, Tobian A . Male circumcision cost-effective articles ignore methodological problems and ethical concerns--reply. JAMA Pediatr. 2013; 167(2):199-200. PMC: 4114513. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.835. View

4.
Londish G, Murray J . Significant reduction in HIV prevalence according to male circumcision intervention in sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Epidemiol. 2008; 37(6):1246-53. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyn038. View

5.
H Gray R, Li X, Kigozi G, Serwadda D, Nalugoda F, Watya S . The impact of male circumcision on HIV incidence and cost per infection prevented: a stochastic simulation model from Rakai, Uganda. AIDS. 2007; 21(7):845-50. DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3280187544. View