» Articles » PMID: 25772092

Complications and Cancer Rates in Spine Fusion with Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 (rhBMP-2)

Overview
Journal Eur Spine J
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2015 Mar 17
PMID 25772092
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To quantitatively synthesize the available best evidence for general complications, heterotopic ossification (HO), retrograde ejaculation, cervical swelling, and cancer rates with the use of rhBMP-2 in lumbar and cervical spine fusion.

Methods: We conducted an online search for relevant controlled trials and extracted data on the abovementioned endpoints. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported on spinal fusion with rhBMP-2 in humans. Publication bias and heterogeneity were assessed mathematically. These data were synthesized in a meta-analysis using DerSimonian-Laird random effects modeling to calculate pooled odds ratios.

Results: We identified 26 studies reporting on a total of 184,324 patients (28,815 experimental, 155,509 controls) with a mean age of 51.1 ± 1.8 years. There was a significantly higher risk of general complications with rhBMP-2 compared to iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.78 (95 %CI 1.20-2.63), (p = 0.004). The odds ratio for HO was 5.57 (95 %CI 1.90-16.36), (p = 0.002), for retrograde ejaculation 3.31 (95 %CI 1.20-9.09), (p = 0.020), and for cervical swelling 4.72 (95 %CI 1.42-15.67), (p = 0.011), all significantly higher in the rhBMP-2 group. The pooled odds ratio for new onset of tumor was 1.35 (95 %CI 0.93-1.96), which represents no statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.111).

Conclusion: rhBMP-2 is associated with a higher rate of general complications as well as retrograde ejaculation, HO, and cervical tissue swelling in spine fusion. There is a slightly increased risk of new onset of tumors, however, without statistical significance.

Citing Articles

An Update in Complication Rates Associated With Anterior Lumbar Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Issa T, Ezeonu T, Sellig M, Donnally 3rd C, Narayanan R, Karamian B Global Spine J. 2024; 15(2):1419-1434.

PMID: 39197439 PMC: 11571399. DOI: 10.1177/21925682241279526.


Evaluation of the Fusion Rate and Safety of -Derived rhBMP-2 in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Disease: A Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm Trial.

Kwon J, Cho J, Lee J, Kim J J Clin Med. 2024; 13(6).

PMID: 38541958 PMC: 10971261. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13061733.


Development of Bioactive Scaffolds for Orthopedic Applications by Designing Additively Manufactured Titanium Porous Structures: A Critical Review.

Kiselevskiy M, Anisimova N, Kapustin A, Ryzhkin A, Kuznetsova D, Polyakova V Biomimetics (Basel). 2023; 8(7).

PMID: 37999187 PMC: 10669447. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics8070546.


Application of rhBMP in spinal fusion surgery: any correlation of cancer incidence? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wijaya J, Tjahyanto T, Alexi R, Purnomo A, Rianto L, Arjuna Y Eur Spine J. 2023; 32(6):2020-2028.

PMID: 37133762 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07730-4.


An empirical comparison of the harmful effects for randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies of interventions.

Dai M, Furuya-Kanamori L, Syed A, Lin L, Wang Q Front Pharmacol. 2023; 14:1064567.

PMID: 37025494 PMC: 10070801. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1064567.


References
1.
Cooper G, Kou T . Risk of cancer after lumbar fusion surgery with recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-2 (rh-BMP-2). Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013; 38(21):1862-8. PMC: 4006942. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a3d3b4. View

2.
Latzman J, Kong L, Liu C, Samadani U . Administration of human recombinant bone morphogenetic protein-2 for spine fusion may be associated with transient postoperative renal insufficiency. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 35(7):E231-7. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c71447. View

3.
Hiremath G, Steinmetz M, Krishnaney A . Is it safe to use recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein in posterior cervical fusion?. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34(9):885-9. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819e334a. View

4.
Buttermann G . Prospective nonrandomized comparison of an allograft with bone morphogenic protein versus an iliac-crest autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine J. 2007; 8(3):426-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.12.006. View

5.
Weiner B, Hurwitz E, Schoene M, Carragee E . Moving forward after YODA. Spine J. 2013; 13(9):995-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.001. View