The Internet As a Source of Information for De Quervain's Tendinitis

Overview

Journal Hand (N Y)

Publisher Sage Publications

Specialties General Surgery
Orthopedics

Date 2015 Mar 14

PMID 25767432

Citations 4

Authors

James C Heap

Bobby Dezfuli

David M Bennett

Eric Chapman

Gregory L DeSilva

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Many individuals are turning to the Internet for information about various health conditions, and in our study we evaluated the quality and readability of information on the internet about De Quervain's tendinitis.

Methods: We chose the search terms "De Quervain's Tendinitis," "De Quervain's Tenosynovitis," and "De Quervain's Syndrome," and entered them into the search engines "Google," "Bing," and "Yahoo" and compiled the search results. The websites were then evaluated and assigned a quality score, a Flesch-Kincaid (FK) reading level, and a subjective quality score. They were then grouped according to the search term used, search engine used, and the order (priority) returned by the search engines. ANOVA analysis and pairwise comparisons of quality and readability among groups, as well as correlation analysis were performed.

Results: The FK readability average was 10.3, above the recommended level. The search term De Quervain's tenosynovitis returned the highest objective quality results. There was no statistical difference found between the different search engines. The first 10 results from the searches were of higher quality than results 11-20, and there was a positive correlation between objective and subjective quality scores but no correlation between readability and objective quality.

Conclusions: We concluded that quality information about De Quervain's tendinitis is available on the internet and is most likely to be found using the search term De Quervain's tenosynovitis and in the first 10 results of an internet search. However, most information is written above the recommended 6th grade reading level.

Citing Articles

Both English- and Spanish-Language Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Online Patient Education Materials Are Written at Higher-Than-Recommended Reading Levels.

Ghahremani J, Chapek M, Xie V, Watarastaporn T, Al-Khatib N, Navarro R Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2025; 6(6):100982.

PMID: 39776507 PMC: 11701936. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100982.

Evaluating the Source and Content of Internet Information Regarding DeQuervain's Tenosynovitis.

Plusch K, Givner D, Carfagno J, Kwok M, Beredjiklian P Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e70882.

PMID: 39497869 PMC: 11534153. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.70882.

Patient Education Materials Found via Google Search for Shoulder Arthroscopy Are Written at Too-High of a Reading Level.

Abdullah Y, Alokozai A, Mathew A, Stamm M, Mulcahey M Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022; 4(4):e1575-e1579.

PMID: 36033169 PMC: 9402457. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.04.034.

Kienböck Disease: Quality, Accuracy, and Readability of Online Information.

Noback P, Trofa D, Dziesinski L, Trupia E, Galle S, Rosenwasser M Hand (N Y). 2018; 15(4):563-572.

PMID: 30556422 PMC: 7370388. DOI: 10.1177/1558944718813631.

Readability of the Most Commonly Accessed Online Patient Education Materials Pertaining to Pathology of the Hand.

Akinleye S, Garofolo-Gonzalez G, Montuori M, Culbertson M, Hashem J, Edelstein D Hand (N Y). 2017; 13(6):705-714.

PMID: 28836453 PMC: 6300184. DOI: 10.1177/1558944717726138.

References

Eysenbach G, Diepgen T . Towards quality management of medical information on the internet: evaluation, labelling, and filtering of information. BMJ. 1998; 317(7171):1496-500. PMC: 1114339. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.317.7171.1496. View

Greywoode J, Bluman E, Spiegel J, Boon M . Readability analysis of patient information on the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery website. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009; 141(5):555-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2009.08.004. View

Winship B, Grisell M, Yang C, Chen R, Bauer A . The quality of pediatric orthopaedic information on the internet. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013; 34(4):474-7. PMC: 5016082. DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000125. View

Morr S, Shanti N, Carrer A, Kubeck J, Gerling M . Quality of information concerning cervical disc herniation on the Internet. Spine J. 2010; 10(4):350-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.009. View

Berkman N, Sheridan S, Donahue K, Halpern D, Crotty K . Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2011; 155(2):97-107. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005. View

Butler L, Foster N . Back pain online: a cross-sectional survey of the quality of web-based information on low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28(4):395-401. DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000048497.38319.D3. View

DAlessandro D, Kingsley P . The readability of pediatric patient education materials on the World Wide Web. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001; 155(7):807-12. DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.155.7.807. View

Trotter M, Morgan D . Patients' use of the Internet for health related matters: a study of Internet usage in 2000 and 2006. Health Informatics J. 2008; 14(3):175-81. DOI: 10.1177/1081180X08092828. View

Wallace L, Lennon E . American Academy of Family Physicians patient education materials: can patients read them?. Fam Med. 2004; 36(8):571-4. View

10.

Greene D, Appel A, Reinert S, Palumbo M . Lumbar disc herniation: evaluation of information on the internet. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(7):826-9. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000157754.98023.cd. View

11.

Duncan I, Kane P, Lawson K, Cohen S, Ciccotti M, Dodson C . Evaluation of information available on the Internet regarding anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2013; 29(6):1101-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.02.008. View

12.

Wang S, Capo J, Orillaza N . Readability and comprehensibility of patient education material in hand-related web sites. J Hand Surg Am. 2009; 34(7):1308-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.04.008. View

13.

Vives M, Young L, Sabharwal S . Readability of spine-related patient education materials from subspecialty organization and spine practitioner websites. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34(25):2826-31. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b4bb0c. View

14.

Dy C, Taylor S, Patel R, McCarthy M, Roberts T, Daluiski A . Does the quality, accuracy, and readability of information about lateral epicondylitis on the internet vary with the search term used?. Hand (N Y). 2013; 7(4):420-5. PMC: 3508024. DOI: 10.1007/s11552-012-9443-z. View

15.

Wang L, Wang J, Wang M, Li Y, Liang Y, Xu D . Using Internet search engines to obtain medical information: a comparative study. J Med Internet Res. 2012; 14(3):e74. PMC: 3799567. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1943. View

16.

Freda M . The readability of American Academy of Pediatrics patient education brochures. J Pediatr Health Care. 2005; 19(3):151-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2005.01.013. View

17.

Badarudeen S, Sabharwal S . Readability of patient education materials from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America web sites. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90(1):199-204. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00347. View

18.

McMullan M . Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient-health professional relationship. Patient Educ Couns. 2006; 63(1-2):24-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.006. View

19.

Wald H, Dube C, Anthony D . Untangling the Web--the impact of Internet use on health care and the physician-patient relationship. Patient Educ Couns. 2007; 68(3):218-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.05.016. View

20.

Polishchuk D, Hashem J, Sabharwal S . Readability of online patient education materials on adult reconstruction Web sites. J Arthroplasty. 2011; 27(5):716-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.08.020. View