Unprogrammed Deworming in the Kibera Slum, Nairobi: Implications for Control of Soil-transmitted Helminthiases
Overview
Tropical Medicine
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Programs for control of soil-transmitted helminth (STH) infections are increasingly evaluating national mass drug administration (MDA) interventions. However, "unprogrammed deworming" (receipt of deworming drugs outside of nationally-run STH control programs) occurs frequently. Failure to account for these activities may compromise evaluations of MDA effectiveness.
Methods: We used a cross-sectional study design to evaluate STH infection and unprogrammed deworming among infants (aged 6-11 months), preschool-aged children (PSAC, aged 1-4 years), and school-aged children (SAC, aged 5-14 years) in Kibera, Kenya, an informal settlement not currently receiving nationally-run MDA for STH. STH infection was assessed by triplicate Kato-Katz. We asked heads of households with randomly-selected children about past-year receipt and source(s) of deworming drugs. Local non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and school staff participating in school-based deworming were interviewed to collect information on drug coverage.
Results: Of 679 children (18 infants, 184 PSAC, and 477 SAC) evaluated, 377 (55%) reported receiving at least one unprogrammed deworming treatment during the past year. PSAC primarily received treatments from chemists (48.3%) or healthcare centers (37.7%); SAC most commonly received treatments at school (55.0%). Four NGOs reported past-year deworming activities at 47 of >150 schools attended by children in our study area. Past-year deworming was negatively associated with any-STH infection (34.8% vs 45.4%, p = 0.005). SAC whose most recent deworming medication was sourced from a chemist were more often infected with Trichuris (38.0%) than those who received their most recent treatment from a health center (17.3%) or school (23.1%) (p = 0.05).
Conclusion: Unprogrammed deworming was received by more than half of children in our study area, from multiple sources. Both individual-level treatment and unprogrammed preventive chemotherapy may serve an important public health function, particularly in the absence of programmed deworming; however, they may also lead to an overestimation of programmed MDA effectiveness. A standardized, validated tool is needed to assess unprogrammed deworming.
Butala C, Fyfe J, Welburn S Front Public Health. 2021; 9:729973.
PMID: 34738003 PMC: 8562424. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.729973.
Lo N, Gupta R, Addiss D, Bendavid E, Heft-Neal S, Mikhailov A PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020; 14(8):e0008551.
PMID: 32804925 PMC: 7462292. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008551.
Lo N, Heft-Neal S, Coulibaly J, Leonard L, Bendavid E, Addiss D Lancet Glob Health. 2019; 7(11):e1511-e1520.
PMID: 31558383 PMC: 7024997. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30413-9.
Deworming in pre-school age children: A global empirical analysis of health outcomes.
Lo N, Snyder J, Addiss D, Heft-Neal S, Andrews J, Bendavid E PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018; 12(5):e0006500.
PMID: 29852012 PMC: 5997348. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006500.
Cooper M, Searing R, Thompson D, Bard D, Carabin H, Gonzales C Glob Pediatr Health. 2017; 4:2333794X17739190.
PMID: 29152541 PMC: 5680937. DOI: 10.1177/2333794X17739190.