» Articles » PMID: 25762000

A Phase I Open-labeled, Single-arm, Dose-escalation, Study of Dichloroacetate (DCA) in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2015 Mar 13
PMID 25762000
Citations 81
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose Preclinical evidence suggests dichloroacetate (DCA) can reverse the Warburg effect and inhibit growth in cancer models. This phase 1 study was undertaken to assess the safety, recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of oral DCA in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients and Methods Twenty-four patients with advanced solid malignancies were enrolled using a standard 3 + 3 protocol at a starting dose of 6.25 mg/kg twice daily (BID). Treatment on 28 days cycles was continued until progression, toxicity, or consent withdrawal. PK samples were collected on days 1 and 15 of cycle 1, and day 1 of subsequent cycles. PET imaging ((18) F-FDG uptake) was investigated as a potential biomarker of response. Results Twenty-three evaluable patients were treated with DCA at two doses: 6.25 mg/kg and 12.5 mg/kg BID (median of 2 cycles each). No DLTs occurred in the 6.25 mg/kg BID cohort so the dose was escalated. Three of seven patients had DLTs (fatigue, vomiting, diarrhea) at 12.5 mg/kg BID. Thirteen additional patients were treated at 6.25 mg/kg BID. Most toxicities were grade 1-2 with the most common being fatigue, neuropathy and nausea. No responses were observed and eight patients had stable disease. The DCA PK profile in cancer patients was consistent with previously published data. There was high variability in PK values and neuropathy among patients. Progressive increase in DCA trough levels and a trend towards decreased (18) F-FDG uptake with length of DCA therapy was observed. Conclusions The RP2D of oral DCA is 6.25 mg/kg BID. Toxicities will require careful monitoring in future trials.

Citing Articles

The role of metabolic reprogramming in liver cancer and its clinical perspectives.

Lu M, Wu Y, Xia M, Zhang Y Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1454161.

PMID: 39610917 PMC: 11602425. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1454161.


Targeting mitochondria: restoring the antitumor efficacy of exhausted T cells.

Yang M, Zhang S, Sun L, Huang L, Yu J, Zhang J Mol Cancer. 2024; 23(1):260.

PMID: 39563438 PMC: 11575104. DOI: 10.1186/s12943-024-02175-9.


The role of glycolysis in tumorigenesis: From biological aspects to therapeutic opportunities.

Cordani M, Michetti F, Zarrabi A, Zarepour A, Rumio C, Strippoli R Neoplasia. 2024; 58:101076.

PMID: 39476482 PMC: 11555605. DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2024.101076.


Stem Cell Theory of Cancer: Clinical Implications for Cellular Metabolism and Anti-Cancer Metabolomics.

Tu S, Chen J, Singh S, Maraboyina S, Gokden N, Hsu P Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(3).

PMID: 38339375 PMC: 10854810. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16030624.


Metabolic reprogramming in the tumor microenvironment of liver cancer.

Lin J, Rao D, Zhang M, Gao Q J Hematol Oncol. 2024; 17(1):6.

PMID: 38297372 PMC: 10832230. DOI: 10.1186/s13045-024-01527-8.


References
1.
Dhar S, Lippard S . Mitaplatin, a potent fusion of cisplatin and the orphan drug dichloroacetate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(52):22199-204. PMC: 2799774. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0912276106. View

2.
Bonnet S, Archer S, Allalunis-Turner J, Haromy A, Beaulieu C, Thompson R . A mitochondria-K+ channel axis is suppressed in cancer and its normalization promotes apoptosis and inhibits cancer growth. Cancer Cell. 2007; 11(1):37-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.10.020. View

3.
Therasse P, Arbuck S, Eisenhauer E, Wanders J, Kaplan R, Rubinstein L . New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000; 92(3):205-16. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205. View

4.
Kumar K, Wigfield S, Gee H, Devlin C, Singleton D, Li J . Dichloroacetate reverses the hypoxic adaptation to bevacizumab and enhances its antitumor effects in mouse xenografts. J Mol Med (Berl). 2013; 91(6):749-58. PMC: 3661713. DOI: 10.1007/s00109-013-0996-2. View

5.
Young H, Baum R, Cremerius U, Herholz K, Hoekstra O, Lammertsma A . Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group. Eur J Cancer. 2000; 35(13):1773-82. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(99)00229-4. View