» Articles » PMID: 25758419

Spatial and Temporal Variation of Total Mercury and Methylmercury in Lacustrine Wetland in Korea

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2015 Mar 12
PMID 25758419
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The spatial and temporal variations of total mercury (THg) and methylmercury (MeHg) concentrations (n = 120, respectively) in water and sediments of the Yangsuri lacustrine wetland in Korea were measured. The average concentrations of THg and MeHg in surface water were 2.04 ± 1.97 and 0.05 ± 0.05 ng L(-1), respectively. The concentrations of THg and MeHg in sediments ranged from 1.28 to 85.83 and ≤0.01 to 0.35 ng g(-1), respectively, and varied depending on the location. In the vegetated zone located near residential areas, the highest concentrations of THg and MeHg in both surface water and sediments were obtained near the residential areas, especially during the fall season. This result might be due to increased methylation rate of Hg by water turnover in the fall season. While THg and MeHg concentrations in water were not correlated, they were significantly correlated in sediment (r = 0.75; P < 0.01). Log-transformed Hg concentrations in sediments were highly correlated with log-transformed organic matter (OM) and acid volatile sulfide (AVS) concentrations (P < 0.01). We also collected five species of fish near the output point of the wetland, and MeHg concentrations in fish tissue varied from 21.30 to 154.66 μg kg(-1) w/w, which was significantly dependent on fish species (P < 0.05). This is the first reported study which measured the levels of mercury, especially MeHg in the wetlands, and freshwater fish species in Korea.

Citing Articles

Bioaccumulation of Mercury and Radiocesium in Waterfowl Introduced to a Site with Legacy Contamination.

Leaphart J, Abercrombie S, Borchert E, Bryan Jr A, Beasley J Environ Toxicol Chem. 2022; 41(10):2479-2487.

PMID: 35866467 DOI: 10.1002/etc.5444.

References
1.
Hammerschmidt C, Fitzgerald W . Geochemical controls on the production and distribution of methylmercury in near-shore marine sediments. Environ Sci Technol. 2004; 38(5):1487-95. DOI: 10.1021/es034528q. View

2.
Lambertsson L, Nilsson M . Organic material: the primary control on mercury methylation and ambient methyl mercury concentrations in estuarine sediments. Environ Sci Technol. 2006; 40(6):1822-9. DOI: 10.1021/es051785h. View

3.
Liu G, Cai Y, Philippi T, Kalla P, Scheidt D, Richards J . Distribution of total and methylmercury in different ecosystem compartments in the Everglades: implications for mercury bioaccumulation. Environ Pollut. 2007; 153(2):257-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.08.030. View

4.
Fitzgerald W, Clarkson T . Mercury and monomethylmercury: present and future concerns. Environ Health Perspect. 1991; 96:159-66. PMC: 1568233. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.9196159. View

5.
Kelly C, Rudd J, Holoka M . Effect of pH on mercury uptake by an aquatic bacterium: implications for Hg cycling. Environ Sci Technol. 2003; 37(13):2941-6. DOI: 10.1021/es026366o. View