» Articles » PMID: 25753574

Hydroclimatic Changes and Drivers in the Sava River Catchment and Comparison with Swedish Catchments

Overview
Journal Ambio
Date 2015 Mar 11
PMID 25753574
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this study, we investigate long-term hydroclimatic changes and their possible relation to regional changes in climate, land-use and water-use over the twentieth century in the transboundary Sava River Catchment (SRC) in South Eastern Europe. In a hydropower dominated part of the SRC, unlike in an unregulated part, we find increase in average annual evapotranspiration and decrease in temporal runoff variability, which are not readily explainable by observed concurrent climate change in temperature and precipitation and may be more related to landscape-internal change drivers. Among the latter investigated here, results indicate hydropower developments as most closely related to the found hydroclimatic shifts, consistent with previous such indications in studies of Swedish hydropower catchments. Overall, the present results have quantitatively framed the recent history and present state of hydroclimate in the SRC, of relevance for water resources in several countries and for a majority of their populations. This provides a useful basis for further assessment of possible future hydroclimatic changes, under different scenarios of climate change and land/water-use developments in the region.

Citing Articles

Impacts of agriculture and snow dynamics on catchment water balance in the U.S. and Great Britain.

Zaerpour M, Hatami S, Ballarin A, Knoben W, Papalexiou S, Pietroniro A Commun Earth Environ. 2024; 5(1):733.

PMID: 39583329 PMC: 11584405. DOI: 10.1038/s43247-024-01891-w.


Fewer Basins Will Follow Their Budyko Curves Under Global Warming and Fossil-Fueled Development.

Jaramillo F, Piemontese L, Berghuijs W, Wang-Erlandsson L, Greve P, Wang Z Water Resour Res. 2022; 58(8):e2021WR031825.

PMID: 36249277 PMC: 9539592. DOI: 10.1029/2021WR031825.


ESPRES: A web application for interactive analysis of multiple pressures in aquatic ecosystems.

Udias A, Pistocchi A, Vigiak O, Grizzetti B, Bouraoui F, Alfaro C Sci Total Environ. 2020; 744:140792.

PMID: 32712417 PMC: 7511691. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140792.

References
1.
Poff N, Olden J, Merritt D, Pepin D . Homogenization of regional river dynamics by dams and global biodiversity implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(14):5732-7. PMC: 1851560. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0609812104. View

2.
Nilsson C, Reidy C, Dynesius M, Revenga C . Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world's large river systems. Science. 2005; 308(5720):405-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.1107887. View

3.
Milly P, Dunne K, Vecchia A . Global pattern of trends in streamflow and water availability in a changing climate. Nature. 2005; 438(7066):347-50. DOI: 10.1038/nature04312. View

4.
Seneviratne S, Luthi D, Litschi M, Schar C . Land-atmosphere coupling and climate change in Europe. Nature. 2006; 443(7108):205-9. DOI: 10.1038/nature05095. View

5.
Botter G, Basso S, Rodriguez-Iturbe I, Rinaldo A . Resilience of river flow regimes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(32):12925-30. PMC: 3740855. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1311920110. View