» Articles » PMID: 25745508

A Multidimensional Approach to Measuring Well-being in Students: Application of the PERMA Framework

Overview
Journal J Posit Psychol
Publisher Routledge
Date 2015 Mar 7
PMID 25745508
Citations 89
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Seligman recently introduced the PERMA model with five core elements of psychological well-being: positive emotions, engagement, relationships, meaning, and accomplishment. We empirically tested this multidimensional theory with 516 Australian male students (age 13-18). From an extensive well-being assessment, we selected a subset of items theoretically relevant to PERMA. Factor analyses recovered four of the five PERMA elements, and two ill-being factors (depression and anxiety). We then explored the nomological net surrounding each factor by examining cross-sectional associations with life satisfaction, hope, gratitude, school engagement, growth mindset, spirituality, physical vitality, physical activity, somatic symptoms, and stressful life events. Factors differentially related to these correlates, offering support for the multidimensional approach to measuring well-being. Directly assessing subjective well-being across multiple domains offers the potential for schools to more systematically understand and promote well-being.

Citing Articles

Compassion Scale: factor structure and scale validation in Hong Kong adolescents.

Ngai S, Cheung C, Ng Y, Guo H, Du H, Chen C Front Psychol. 2025; 16:1508402.

PMID: 40078424 PMC: 11897485. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1508402.


The effectiveness of PERMA model education on university students' well-being.

Dorri Sedeh S, Aghaei A J Educ Health Promot. 2024; 13:338.

PMID: 39679036 PMC: 11639425. DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_840_23.


Effects of positive education intervention on growth mindset and resilience among boarding middle school adolescents in China: a randomized controlled trial.

Jianping G, Roslan S, Soh K, Zaremohzzabieh Z Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1446260.

PMID: 39654937 PMC: 11626001. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1446260.


Which character strengths may build organizational well-being? Insights from an international sample of workers.

Casali N, Feraco T PLoS One. 2024; 19(10):e0312934.

PMID: 39476103 PMC: 11524506. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312934.


A scoping review of well-being measures: conceptualisation and scales for overall well-being.

Zhang W, Balloo K, Hosein A, Medland E BMC Psychol. 2024; 12(1):585.

PMID: 39443963 PMC: 11515516. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-024-02074-0.


References
1.
Diener E, Emmons R, Larsen R, Griffin S . The Satisfaction With Life Scale. J Pers Assess. 1985; 49(1):71-5. DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13. View

2.
Huppert F, So T . Flourishing Across Europe: Application of a New Conceptual Framework for Defining Well-Being. Soc Indic Res. 2013; 110(3):837-861. PMC: 3545194. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-011-9966-7. View

3.
Friedman H, Kern M . Personality, well-being, and health. Annu Rev Psychol. 2014; 65:719-42. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115123. View

4.
Cacioppo J, Gardner W, Berntson G . Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: the case of attitudes and evaluative space. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 1997; 1(1):3-25. DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0101_2. View

5.
Hoyt L, Chase-Lansdale P, McDade T, Adam E . Positive youth, healthy adults: does positive well-being in adolescence predict better perceived health and fewer risky health behaviors in young adulthood?. J Adolesc Health. 2011; 50(1):66-73. PMC: 3245514. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.05.002. View