Histopathological and Morphometric Changes Induced by a Dextran Sodium Sulfate (DSS) Model in Broilers
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Oral administration of dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) is commonly used as an inducer of enteric inflammation in rodents. However, there is a dearth of knowledge regarding appropriate dosage, timing, or ageresponses in broilers for this potential inducer of inflammation without necrosis. Two experiments were conducted in day-of-hatch chicks to analyze clinical parameters and enteric histological changes induced by DSS when administered via drinking water ( DW: ). In both experiments, birds were distributed into nontreated control or varying concentrations of DSS in DW. For both experiments, only 0.75% DSS in DW was histologically evaluated. In Experiment 1, chicks received DSS from day 3 to 11, and at 3, 6, and 8 d of treatment, chicks were weighed, and sections of the duodenum, ileum, and ceca were formalin fixed. The addition of 0.75% DSS caused depression, anemia, and watery bloody diarrhea, plus significantly (P < 0.05) decreased BW gain at all times. Shortened ileal villi at 6 d and duodenal villi at 8 d of treatment, reduced duodenal and ileal epithelial cell height at 3, 6, and 8 d, and increased duodenal goblet cell density at 6 and 8 d were observed in response to DSS administration (P < 0.05). In Experiment 2, birds received DSS from days 10 to 16 and were sampled at 3 and 6 d of treatment. Similar changes were found in ceca of treated birds. There was no significant change in the duodenal villus height and goblet cell density by 6 d of treatment, suggesting that 6 d of 0.75% DSS in DW was not sufficient for the reproduction of duodenal symptoms in these older birds. However, there was a significant decrease in ilealvillus height and decreased ileal epithelial cell height at 3 and 6 d of treatment, as well as a significant decrease in BW compared to the control group. These findings indicate that DW administration of 0.75% DSS caused generalized mild and non-necrotic enteritis in broilers and that this compound may be useful for enteric inflammation modeling in poultry.
Lee J, Kim J, Choi J, Noh B, Kim H, Cho E Foods. 2024; 13(7).
PMID: 38611304 PMC: 11011819. DOI: 10.3390/foods13070998.
Liu L, Sui W, Yang Y, Liu L, Li Q, Guo A Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(24).
PMID: 36552471 PMC: 9774581. DOI: 10.3390/ani12243552.
Kolba N, Cheng J, Jackson C, Tako E Nutrients. 2022; 14(22).
PMID: 36432481 PMC: 9696943. DOI: 10.3390/nu14224795.
Chen J, Yu Y J Poult Sci. 2022; 59(3):260-271.
PMID: 35989696 PMC: 9346603. DOI: 10.2141/jpsa.0210139.
Nii T J Poult Sci. 2022; 59(2):105-113.
PMID: 35528386 PMC: 9039148. DOI: 10.2141/jpsa.0210090.