» Articles » PMID: 25742799

Morphogenesis of the Mouse Neural Plate Depends on Distinct Roles of Cofilin 1 in Apical and Basal Epithelial Domains

Overview
Journal Development
Specialty Biology
Date 2015 Mar 7
PMID 25742799
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The genetic control of mammalian epithelial polarity and dynamics can be studied in vivo at cellular resolution during morphogenesis of the mouse neural tube. The mouse neural plate is a simple epithelium that is transformed into a columnar pseudostratified tube over the course of ∼ 24 h. Apical F-actin is known to be important for neural tube closure, but the precise roles of actin dynamics in the neural epithelium are not known. To determine how the organization of the neural epithelium and neural tube closure are affected when actin dynamics are blocked, we examined the cellular basis of the neural tube closure defect in mouse mutants that lack the actin-severing protein cofilin 1 (CFL1). Although apical localization of the adherens junctions, the Par complex, the Crumbs complex and SHROOM3 is normal in the mutants, CFL1 has at least two distinct functions in the apical and basal domains of the neural plate. Apically, in the absence of CFL1 myosin light chain does not become phosphorylated, indicating that CFL1 is required for the activation of apical actomyosin required for neural tube closure. On the basal side of the neural plate, loss of CFL1 has the opposite effect on myosin: excess F-actin and myosin accumulate and the ectopic myosin light chain is phosphorylated. The basal accumulation of F-actin is associated with the assembly of ectopic basal tight junctions and focal disruptions of the basement membrane, which eventually lead to a breakdown of epithelial organization.

Citing Articles

Nance-Horan-syndrome-like 1b controls mesodermal cell migration by regulating protrusion and actin dynamics during zebrafish gastrulation.

Escot S, Hassanein Y, Elouin A, Torres-Paz J, Mellottee L, Ignace A Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):328.

PMID: 40021913 PMC: 11871229. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07689-6.


Linking planar polarity signalling to actomyosin contractility during vertebrate neurulation.

Novotna S, Maia L, Radaszkiewicz K, Roudnicky P, Harnos J Open Biol. 2024; 14(11):240251.

PMID: 39561813 PMC: 11576107. DOI: 10.1098/rsob.240251.


Canonical and Non-Canonical Localization of Tight Junction Proteins during Early Murine Cranial Development.

Mak S, Hammes A Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(3).

PMID: 38338705 PMC: 10855338. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25031426.


Distinct spatiotemporal contribution of morphogenetic events and mechanical tissue coupling during Xenopus neural tube closure.

Christodoulou N, Skourides P Development. 2022; 149(13).

PMID: 35662330 PMC: 9340557. DOI: 10.1242/dev.200358.


Cofilin Signaling in the CNS Physiology and Neurodegeneration.

Namme J, Bepari A, Takebayashi H Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(19).

PMID: 34639067 PMC: 8509315. DOI: 10.3390/ijms221910727.


References
1.
Garcia-Garcia M, Eggenschwiler J, Caspary T, Alcorn H, Wyler M, Huangfu D . Analysis of mouse embryonic patterning and morphogenesis by forward genetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(17):5913-9. PMC: 1087930. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0501071102. View

2.
Ivanov A, Hunt D, Utech M, Nusrat A, Parkos C . Differential roles for actin polymerization and a myosin II motor in assembly of the epithelial apical junctional complex. Mol Biol Cell. 2005; 16(6):2636-50. PMC: 1142412. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e05-01-0043. View

3.
Hildebrand J . Shroom regulates epithelial cell shape via the apical positioning of an actomyosin network. J Cell Sci. 2005; 118(Pt 22):5191-203. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.02626. View

4.
Chen X, Macara I . Par-3 mediates the inhibition of LIM kinase 2 to regulate cofilin phosphorylation and tight junction assembly. J Cell Biol. 2006; 172(5):671-8. PMC: 2063700. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200510061. View

5.
Blair A, Tomlinson A, Pham H, Gunsalus K, Goldberg M, Laski F . Twinstar, the Drosophila homolog of cofilin/ADF, is required for planar cell polarity patterning. Development. 2006; 133(9):1789-97. DOI: 10.1242/dev.02320. View