» Articles » PMID: 25742686

Risk of Dementia in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients Compared with Hemodialysis Patients

Overview
Journal Perit Dial Int
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2015 Mar 7
PMID 25742686
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Compared with similarly aged controls, patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have a higher prevalence of cognitive impairment and more rapid cognitive decline, which is not explained by traditional risk factors alone. Since previous small studies suggest an association of cognitive impairment with dialysis modality, we compared incident dementia among patients initiating hemodialysis (HD) vs peritoneal dialysis (PD) in a large national cohort.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of incident dialysis patients in the United States from 2006 to 2008 with no diagnosis of dementia prior to beginning dialysis. We evaluated the effect of initial dialysis modality on incidence of dementia, diagnosed by Medicare claims data, adjusted for baseline demographic and clinical data from the USRDS registry.

Results: Our analysis included 121,623 patients, of whom 8,663 initiated dialysis on PD. The mean age of our cohort was 69.2 years. Patients who initiated PD had a lower cumulative incidence of dementia than those who initiated HD (1.0% vs 2.7%, 2.5% vs 5.3%, and 3.9% vs 7.3% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively). The risk of dementia for patients who started on PD was lower compared with those who started on HD, with a hazard ratio (HR) = 0.46 [0.41, 0.53], in an unadjusted model and HR 0.74 [0.64, 0.86] in a matched model.

Conclusions: Dialysis modality is associated with incident dementia in a cohort of older ESRD patients. This finding warrants further investigation of the effect of dialysis modality on cognitive function and evaluation for possible mechanisms.

Citing Articles

Kidney replacement therapies in the older person: challenges to decide the best option.

Selwood J, Dani M, Corbett R, Brown E Clin Kidney J. 2025; 18(2):sfaf020.

PMID: 39995809 PMC: 11848140. DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfaf020.


Elevated HIF-1α levels in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a potential link to increased cognitive impairment risk.

Guo L, Jia C, Luo K, Liang J, Wang L, Hui T Front Aging Neurosci. 2024; 16:1455596.

PMID: 39717345 PMC: 11663881. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1455596.


Assisted peritoneal dialysis compared to in-centre hemodialysis - an observational study of outcomes from the Swedish Renal Registry.

Rydell H, Segelmark M, Clyne N BMC Nephrol. 2024; 25(1):349.

PMID: 39402451 PMC: 11475596. DOI: 10.1186/s12882-024-03799-1.


Treatment of chronic kidney disease in older populations.

Kishi S, Kadoya H, Kashihara N Nat Rev Nephrol. 2024; 20(9):586-602.

PMID: 38977884 DOI: 10.1038/s41581-024-00854-w.


Towards a better uptake of home dialysis in Europe: understanding the present and looking to the future.

Brown E, Boni Brivio G, Van Biesen W Clin Kidney J. 2024; 17(Suppl 1):i3-i12.

PMID: 38846418 PMC: 11151115. DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfae082.


References
1.
Erdem Tilki H, Akpolat T, Tunali G, Kara A, Onar M . Effects of haemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis on P300 cognitive potentials in uraemic patients. Ups J Med Sci. 2004; 109(1):43-8. DOI: 10.3109/2000-1967-109. View

2.
Tang M, Cross P, Andrews H, Jacobs D, Small S, Bell K . Incidence of AD in African-Americans, Caribbean Hispanics, and Caucasians in northern Manhattan. Neurology. 2001; 56(1):49-56. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.56.1.49. View

3.
Park H, OConnell J, Thomson R . A systematic review of cognitive decline in the general elderly population. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003; 18(12):1121-34. DOI: 10.1002/gps.1023. View

4.
Nissenson A, Prichard S, Cheng I, Gokal R, Kubota M, Maiorca R . Non-medical factors that impact on ESRD modality selection. Kidney Int Suppl. 1993; 40:S120-7. View

5.
Fazekas G, Fazekas F, Schmidt R, Kapeller P, Offenbacher H, Krejs G . Brain MRI findings and cognitive impairment in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis treatment. J Neurol Sci. 1995; 134(1-2):83-8. DOI: 10.1016/0022-510x(95)00226-7. View