» Articles » PMID: 25742326

Manipulation and in Vitro Maturation of Xenopus Laevis Oocytes, Followed by Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection, to Study Embryonic Development

Overview
Journal J Vis Exp
Date 2015 Mar 6
PMID 25742326
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Amphibian eggs have been widely used to study embryonic development. Early embryonic development is driven by maternally stored factors accumulated during oogenesis. In order to study roles of such maternal factors in early embryonic development, it is desirable to manipulate their functions from the very beginning of embryonic development. Conventional ways of gene interference are achieved by injection of antisense oligonucleotides (oligos) or mRNA into fertilized eggs, enabling under- or over-expression of specific proteins, respectively. However, these methods normally require more than several hours until protein expression is affected, and, hence, the interference of gene functions is not effective during early embryonic stages. Here, we introduce an experimental system in which expression levels of maternal proteins can be altered before fertilization. Xenopus laevis oocytes obtained from ovaries are defolliculated by incubating with enzymes. Antisense oligos or mRNAs are injected into defolliculated oocytes at the germinal vesicle (GV) stage. These oocytes are in vitro matured to eggs at the metaphase II (MII) stage, followed by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). By this way, up to 10% of ICSI embryos can reach the swimming tadpole stage, thus allowing functional tests of specific gene knockdown or overexpression. This approach can be a useful way to study roles of maternally stored factors in early embryonic development.

Citing Articles

The Sixth Mass Extinction and Amphibian Species Sustainability Through Reproduction and Advanced Biotechnologies, Biobanking of Germplasm and Somatic Cells, and Conservation Breeding Programs (RBCs).

Browne R, Luo Q, Wang P, Mansour N, Kaurova S, Gakhova E Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(23).

PMID: 39682361 PMC: 11640735. DOI: 10.3390/ani14233395.


cell-free extracts and their applications in cell biology study.

Liu J, Zhang C Biophys Rep. 2024; 9(4):195-205.

PMID: 38516620 PMC: 10951473. DOI: 10.52601/bpr.2023.230016.


Genome-wide analysis identifies -acting elements regulating mRNA polyadenylation and translation during vertebrate oocyte maturation.

Yang F, Wang W, Cetinbas M, Sadreyev R, Blower M RNA. 2020; 26(3):324-344.

PMID: 31896558 PMC: 7025505. DOI: 10.1261/rna.073247.119.


Oocyte Host-Transfer and Maternal mRNA Depletion Experiments in .

Houston D Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2018; 2018(10).

PMID: 29321286 PMC: 6538067. DOI: 10.1101/pdb.prot096982.


Expanding the genetic toolkit in Xenopus: Approaches and opportunities for human disease modeling.

Tandon P, Conlon F, Furlow J, Horb M Dev Biol. 2016; 426(2):325-335.

PMID: 27109192 PMC: 5074924. DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.04.009.


References
1.
Guo X, Zhang T, Hu Z, Zhang Y, Shi Z, Wang Q . Efficient RNA/Cas9-mediated genome editing in Xenopus tropicalis. Development. 2014; 141(3):707-14. DOI: 10.1242/dev.099853. View

2.
Heasman J, Crawford A, Goldstone K, Gumbiner B, McCrea P, Kintner C . Overexpression of cadherins and underexpression of beta-catenin inhibit dorsal mesoderm induction in early Xenopus embryos. Cell. 1994; 79(5):791-803. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90069-8. View

3.
Sakane Y, Sakuma T, Kashiwagi K, Kashiwagi A, Yamamoto T, Suzuki K . Targeted mutagenesis of multiple and paralogous genes in Xenopus laevis using two pairs of transcription activator-like effector nucleases. Dev Growth Differ. 2013; 56(1):108-14. DOI: 10.1111/dgd.12105. View

4.
Szenker E, Lacoste N, Almouzni G . A developmental requirement for HIRA-dependent H3.3 deposition revealed at gastrulation in Xenopus. Cell Rep. 2012; 1(6):730-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.05.006. View

5.
Heasman J, Kofron M, Wylie C . Beta-catenin signaling activity dissected in the early Xenopus embryo: a novel antisense approach. Dev Biol. 2000; 222(1):124-34. DOI: 10.1006/dbio.2000.9720. View