» Articles » PMID: 2574052

CNS-related Subjective Symptoms During Treatment with Beta 1-adrenoceptor Antagonists (atenolol, Metoprolol): Two Double-blind Placebo Controlled Studies

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1989 Nov 1
PMID 2574052
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

1. Whilst a number of studies have investigated whether metoprolol and atenolol, the most widely used beta 1-adrenoceptor antagonists, differ with regard to CNS-related subjective symptoms, few placebo-controlled studies using standardised questionnaires have been performed. 2. In the present report, the findings of two randomised, double-blind, cross-over studies in healthy volunteers are presented. The subjects were treated with placebo and atenolol (100 mg once daily) (Study 1) and metoprolol (100 mg once daily) and placebo (Study 2). 3. Subjective experiences were evaluated using a standardised instrument, the Minor Symptoms Evaluation-profile (MSE-profile), which was filled in 4, 8 and 24 h after intake of the tablets. A Type A questionnaire was also completed by the subjects. 4. At 4 h both metoprolol and atenolol were found to affect negatively vitality and contentment, but these effects had declined after 8 h. A significant adverse effect on sleep was shown for atenolol compared with placebo, while no negative effect was observed for metoprolol. No significant differences were found in relation to Type A behaviour and beta-adrenoceptor blockade. The number of subjects with Type A personality was, however, low. 5. The results of the studies indicate that the subjective symptoms of the beta 1-adrenoceptor blockers are mild, and that the effects appear consistently with the recognised pharmacokinetic profiles of the two drugs.

Citing Articles

Propranolol Treatment for Infantile Hemangiomas: Short-Term Adverse Effects and Follow-Up to Age Two.

Li X, Yang K, Li H, Huo R Biomed Res Int. 2019; 2019:2728952.

PMID: 31886190 PMC: 6899275. DOI: 10.1155/2019/2728952.


CNS-related performance and haemodynamics of metoprolol-Oros and propranolol after single and 3 days dosing in healthy volunteers.

van Steveninck A, Pieters M, Schoemaker H, Breimer D, Cohen A Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1993; 35(2):114-20.

PMID: 8443028 PMC: 1381501. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1993.tb05676.x.


Effects of diltiazem and metoprolol on blood pressure, adverse symptoms and general well-being. The Swedish Diltiazem-Metoprolol Multi-Centre Study Group.

Dahlof C, Hedner T, Thulin T, Gustafsson S, Olsson S Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1991; 40(5):453-60.

PMID: 1884720 DOI: 10.1007/BF00315222.


Atenolol. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disorders.

Wadworth A, Murdoch D, Brogden R Drugs. 1991; 42(3):468-510.

PMID: 1720383 DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199142030-00007.

References
1.
Allen M, Lawler K, Mitchell V, Matthews K, Rakaczky C, Jamison W . Type A behavior pattern, parental history of hypertension, and cardiovascular reactivity in college males. Health Psychol. 1987; 6(2):113-30. DOI: 10.1037//0278-6133.6.2.113. View

2.
Schmieder R, Friedrich G, Neus H, Rudel H, von Eiff A . The influence of beta blockers on cardiovascular reactivity and Type A behavior pattern in hypertensives. Psychosom Med. 1983; 45(5):417-23. DOI: 10.1097/00006842-198310000-00005. View

3.
Julius S . Role of the sympathetic nervous system in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease. Am Heart J. 1987; 114(1 Pt 2):232-4. DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(87)90970-7. View

4.
Drayer D . Lipophilicity, hydrophilicity, and the central nervous system side effects of beta blockers. Pharmacotherapy. 1987; 7(4):87-91. DOI: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.1987.tb04029.x. View

5.
Wilhelmsen L, Berglund G, Elmfeldt D, Fitzsimons T, Holzgreve H, Hosie J . Beta-blockers versus diuretics in hypertensive men: main results from the HAPPHY trial. J Hypertens. 1987; 5(5):561-72. DOI: 10.1097/00004872-198710000-00009. View