Prognostic Implications of Low Level Cardiac Troponin Elevation Using High-sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hsTnT) is used in many countries, but is not available in the United States. Prior evidence has been viewed as inconclusive as to whether low cardiac troponin T (cTnT) concentrations detected with hsTnT are prognostically meaningful compared with fourth-generation cTnT.
Hypothesis: The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic performance of low-level cTnT elevations using the hsTnT assay compared with the assay (fourth-generation) currently available in the United States.
Methods: We measured serum cTnT in 4160 patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome using both the hsTnT and fourth-generation assays. Patients were stratified at the 99th percentile cut point for each assay.
Results: Patients with baseline hsTnT ≥14 ng/L (n = 3697) vs <14 ng/L were at higher 30-day risk of cardiovascular death (CVD) or myocardial infarction (MI) (9.1% vs 1.9%, P < 0.0001). After adjusting for all other elements of the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction risk score, hsTnT ≥14 carried a 5.2-fold higher risk of CVD/MI (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.6-10.1, P < 0.0001). Low levels of hsTnT (14-50 ng/L) also revealed increased risk (CVD/MI: 6.4%, P = 0.002). Importantly, patients with negative fourth-generation cTnT but positive hsTnT were at 4.5-times higher risk of CVD/MI (95% CI: 1.9-11.0, P = 0.0008) than patients with negative hsTnT. In contrast, patients with a negative hsTnT but positive fourth-generation cTnT result had a lower rate of CVD/MI than with a positive hsTnT (1.3% vs 8.2%, P = 0.0005).
Conclusions: Low-level increases in cTnT detected using the hsTnT assay identified patients at a meaningfully higher risk and who might otherwise be missed, and improves upon risk stratification using the cTnT assay currently available in the United States.
Gutierrez-Gallegos P, Jimenez-Franco V, Jerjes-Sanchez C, Quevedo-Salazar R, Rodriguez-Rivera J, Paredes-Gutierrez E Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1444636.
PMID: 39105076 PMC: 11298445. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1444636.
Li S, She F, Lv T, Geng Y, Xue Y, Miao G Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2021; 17(1):54-59.
PMID: 33868418 PMC: 8039922. DOI: 10.5114/aic.2021.104769.
The Biomarkers for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure.
Wang X, Zhang F, Zhang C, Zheng L, Yang J Biomed Res Int. 2020; 2020:2018035.
PMID: 32016113 PMC: 6988690. DOI: 10.1155/2020/2018035.
Mok Y, Sang Y, Ballew S, Hoogeveen R, Ballantyne C, Rosamond W Am Heart J. 2019; 216:62-73.
PMID: 31404723 PMC: 6842707. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.07.002.
Fladseth K, Kristensen A, Mannsverk J, Trovik T, Schirmer H Open Heart. 2018; 5(2):e000888.
PMID: 30487980 PMC: 6241968. DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000888.