» Articles » PMID: 25733346

Two-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using Self-locking Stand-alone Polyetheretherketone Cages with Two Anchoring Clips Placed in the Upper and Lower Vertebrae, Respectively

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2015 Mar 4
PMID 25733346
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a widely accepted surgical procedure for the treatment of cervical degenerative disk diseases (CDDD). The purpose of our study was to investigate the reliability and efficacy of ACDF using self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages, with two anchoring clips placed in the upper and lower vertebrae, respectively.

Methods And Materials: Twenty-six patients who underwent ACDF using a stand-alone PEEK cage packed with local osteophytes and cancellous allograft bone from January 2010 to January 2012 were enrolled in this study. Clinical findings were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, neck disability index (NDI), and Odom criteria. Intervertebral height and cervical fusion status were assessed on X-ray.

Results: Twenty-six patients underwent ACDF using a stand-alone PEEK cervical cage. All patients had a minimum 2 years of follow-up. The operative levels were C3/4, C4/5 in seven patients, C4/5, C5/6 in 13 patients, and C4/5, C6/7 in six patients. At 3 days, 6 months, and 2 years of follow-ups, the JOA scores were 10.41 ± 1.67, 13.78 ± 1.91, 14.42 ± 2.09, respectively, which was significantly higher (p < 0.01) than preoperative (7.34 ± 1.71), whereas VAS overall pain score was 4.35 ± 1.32, 1.73 ± 0.44, 1.32 ± 0.57, respectively, which was significantly lower (p < 0.01) than preoperative (8.01 ± 1.16). The NDI preoperatively was 33.94 ± 11.75, 23.53 ± 10.92 at 3 days postoperatively, 12.64 ± 8.36 at 6 months, and 10.74 ± 7.92 at 2 years of follow-ups. Intervertebral height was 5.99 ± 0.31 mm preoperatively, 8.70 ± 0.23 mm at 3 days, 8.34 ± 0.61 mm at 6 months, and 8.22 ± 0.35 mm at 2 years of follow-ups. According to Odom criteria, 10 patients (38.4%) presented with an excellent clinical outcome, 15 good (57.6%), 1 fair (3.8%), and no patient presented a poor outcome. Solid fusion was achieved in all patients (100%) at a mean time of 4.5 months.

Conclusion: ACDF using a self-locking stand-alone PEEK cage with two anchoring clips placed in the upper and lower vertebrae, respectively, could be considered a safe and effective substitute for fusion in patients with two-level CDDD; it can effectively restore the intervertebral height, facilitate radiologic follow-up, cause few complications, and lead to satisfactory outcomes.

Citing Articles

Zero-Profile Anchored Spacer (ROI-C) in the Treatment of Cervical Adjacent Segment Disease.

Iampreechakul P, Choochaimangkhala P, Tirakotai W, Hangsapruek S, Puthkhao P, Tanpun A Asian J Neurosurg. 2022; 17(2):209-217.

PMID: 36120612 PMC: 9473862. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1750837.


Validation of a novel blinding method for measuring postoperative knee articular cartilage using magnetic resonance imaging.

Moyer R, Birmingham T, Eckstein F, Wirth W, Maschek S, Chronik B MAGMA. 2019; 32(6):693-702.

PMID: 31300932 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-019-00766-y.


Evaluation of bony fusion after anterior cervical discectomy: a systematic literature review.

Noordhoek I, Koning M, Vleggeert-Lankamp C Eur Spine J. 2018; 28(2):386-399.

PMID: 30448985 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5820-9.


Comparison of the clinical effects of zero-profile anchored spacer (ROI-C) and conventional cage-plate construct for the treatment of noncontiguous bilevel of cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD): A minimum 2-year follow-up.

Lu Y, Bao W, Wang Z, Zhou F, Zou J, Jiang W Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97(5):e9808.

PMID: 29384883 PMC: 5805455. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009808.

References
1.
Sugawara T, Itoh Y, Hirano Y, Higashiyama N, Mizoi K . Long term outcome and adjacent disc degeneration after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with titanium cylindrical cages. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2009; 151(4):303-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-009-0217-5. View

2.
Yang J, Yu C, Chang B, Yeom J, Lee J, Lee C . Subsidence and nonunion after anterior cervical interbody fusion using a stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage. Clin Orthop Surg. 2011; 3(1):16-23. PMC: 3042165. DOI: 10.4055/cios.2011.3.1.16. View

3.
Shad A, Leach J, Teddy P, Cadoux-Hudson T . Use of the Solis cage and local autologous bone graft for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: early technical experience. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005; 2(2):116-22. DOI: 10.3171/spi.2005.2.2.0116. View

4.
Ha S, Park J, Kim S, Lim D, Kim S, Lee S . Radiologic Assessment of Subsidence in Stand-Alone Cervical Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Cage. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2009; 44(6):370-4. PMC: 2615140. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2008.44.6.370. View

5.
Gercek E, Arlet V, Delisle J, Marchesi D . Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning. Eur Spine J. 2003; 12(5):513-6. PMC: 3468003. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-003-0539-6. View