» Articles » PMID: 25732385

Transpiration and Water-use Efficiency in Mixed-species Forests Versus Monocultures: Effects of Tree Size, Stand Density and Season

Overview
Journal Tree Physiol
Specialty Biology
Date 2015 Mar 4
PMID 25732385
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mixtures can be more productive than monocultures and may therefore use more water, which may make them more susceptible to droughts. The species interactions that influence growth, transpiration and water-use efficiency (WUE, tree growth per unit transpiration) within a given mixture vary with intra- and inter-annual climatic variability, stand density and tree size, but these effects remain poorly quantified. These relationships were examined in mixtures and monocultures of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. and Acacia mearnsii de Wildeman. Growth and transpiration were measured between ages 14 and 15 years. All E. globulus trees in mixture that were growing faster than similar sized trees in monocultures had higher WUE, while trees with similar growth rates had similar WUE. By the age of 14 years A. mearnsii trees were beginning to senesce and there were no longer any relationships between tree size and growth or WUE. The relationship between transpiration and tree size did not differ between treatments for either species, so stand-level increases in transpiration simply reflected the larger mean tree size in mixtures. Increasing neighbourhood basal area increased the complementarity effect on E. globulus growth and transpiration. The complementarity effect also varied throughout the year, but this was not related to the climatic seasonality. This study shows that stand-level responses can be the net effect of a much wider range of individual tree-level responses, but at both levels, if growth has not increased for a given species, it appears unlikely that there will be differences in transpiration or WUE for that species. Growth data may provide a useful initial indication of whether mixtures have higher transpiration or WUE, and which species and tree sizes contribute to this effect.

Citing Articles

Satellite Remote Sensing Reveals More Beneficial Effect of Forest Plant Diversity on Drought Resistance in More Arid Areas of Yunnan, China.

Ma G, Sun H, Hu K, Zhou H Ecol Evol. 2025; 15(2):e70999.

PMID: 39975706 PMC: 11836341. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70999.


Estimation of changes in carbon sequestration and its economic value with various stand density and rotation age of Pinus massoniana plantations in China.

Bai Y, Ding G Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):16852.

PMID: 39039162 PMC: 11263345. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-67307-z.


Contrasting sap flow characteristics between pioneer and late-successional tree species in secondary tropical montane forests of Eastern Himalaya, India.

Kumar M, Joseph G, Bhutia Y, Krishnaswamy J J Exp Bot. 2023; 74(17):5273-5293.

PMID: 37290031 PMC: 10498023. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erad207.


Species Diversity Regulates Ecological Strategy Spectra of Forest Vegetation Across Different Climatic Zones.

Han X, Xu Y, Huang J, Zang R Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13:807369.

PMID: 35310647 PMC: 8924497. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.807369.


The relationship between tree size and tree water-use: is competition for water size-symmetric or size-asymmetric?.

Forrester D, Limousin J, Pfautsch S Tree Physiol. 2022; 42(10):1916-1927.

PMID: 35157081 PMC: 9838098. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpac018.