» Articles » PMID: 25731633

Impact of Follow-up Consultations for ICU Survivors on Post-ICU Syndrome: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2015 Mar 4
PMID 25731633
Citations 55
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of routine follow-up consultations versus standard of care for intensive care unit (ICU) survivors.

Methods: Systematic literature review from five databases (Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL), reference lists, citation tracking, and ongoing/unpublished trials. Randomized controlled trials investigating post-ICU consultations in adults with outcomes such as quality of life (QOL), anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), physical ability, cognitive function, and return to work were included. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed quality independently. The mean differences, risk ratios, and 95 % confidence intervals were calculated depending on outcome measures.

Results: From 1544 citations, five trials were included (855 patients). The overall risk of bias was low in two trials, unclear in two trials, and high in one trial. The overall quality of evidence was low. The trials assessed follow-up interventions defined as consultations informing survivors about their ICU stay. One trial found no effect on QOL. Pooling data from two trials (n = 374) showed a protective effect on risk of new onset PTSD at 3-6 months after ICU (risk ratio 0.49, 95 % CI 0.26-0.95). There was no effect on other outcomes.

Conclusions: The evidence indicates that follow-up consultations might reduce symptoms of PTSD at 3-6 months after ICU discharge in ICU survivors, but without affecting QOL and other outcomes investigated. This review highlights that planning of future RCTs should aim to standardize interventions and outcome measures to allow for comparisons across studies.

Citing Articles

Associations Between Elevated Rates of Depression, Anxiety, and PTSD Among ICU Survivors and Increased Mortality and Readmissions.

Chang C, Tsai F, Liao C Brain Behav. 2025; 15(2):e70319.

PMID: 39957084 PMC: 11830751. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.70319.


A pilot study comparing the rehabilitation functional outcomes of post-COVID-19 stroke and non-COVID stroke patients: An occupational therapy perspective.

Asirvatham T, Sukumaran R, Issac Chandran P, Boppana A, Nasser Awadh M Qatar Med J. 2025; 2024(4):70.

PMID: 39925823 PMC: 11806636. DOI: 10.5339/qmj.2024.70.


ICU follow-up services and their impact on post-intensive care syndrome: a scoping review protocol.

Zhang R, Xu Y, Tian Y, He L, Chu Y BMJ Open. 2024; 14(11):e089824.

PMID: 39532379 PMC: 11574462. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089824.


A Case Report and Review of the Literature of ICU Delirium.

Brice A, Brice R Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(15).

PMID: 39120209 PMC: 11311817. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12151506.


Impact of healthcare interventions on distress following acute musculoskeletal/orthopaedic injury: a scoping review of systematic reviews.

Sim A, McNeilage A, Gholamrezaei A, Rebbeck T, Ashton-James C BMJ Open. 2024; 14(7):e085778.

PMID: 39025825 PMC: 11261706. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085778.


References
1.
Chrispin P, Scotton H, Rogers J, Lloyd D, Ridley S . Short Form 36 in the intensive care unit: assessment of acceptability, reliability and validity of the questionnaire. Anaesthesia. 1997; 52(1):15-23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.015-az014.x. View

2.
Griffiths J, Barber V, Cuthbertson B, Young J . A national survey of intensive care follow-up clinics. Anaesthesia. 2006; 61(10):950-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04792.x. View

3.
Prinjha S, Field K, Rowan K . What patients think about ICU follow-up services: a qualitative study. Crit Care. 2009; 13(2):R46. PMC: 2689490. DOI: 10.1186/cc7769. View

4.
Granja C, Amaro A, Dias C, Costa-Pereira A . Outcome of ICU survivors: a comprehensive review. The role of patient-reported outcome studies. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012; 56(9):1092-103. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02686.x. View

5.
Angus D, Carlet J . Surviving intensive care: a report from the 2002 Brussels Roundtable. Intensive Care Med. 2003; 29(3):368-77. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-002-1624-8. View