» Articles » PMID: 25729752

Perceived Characteristics of E-cigarettes As an Innovation by Young Adults

Overview
Date 2015 Mar 3
PMID 25729752
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: We examined channels through which information about e-cigarettes has flowed, public perception of e-cigarettes as an innovation, and how these may influence use.

Methods: An online survey of US adults aged 18-24 years (N = 874) was used. Measures included information channels, perception of e-cigarettes as an innovation, and intention to use.

Results: Television ranked first for exposure to e-cigarette information. The most positive innovation attributes were observability and relative advantage. A structural model showed that information exposure and favorable perception as an innovation predicted use.

Conclusions: The high degree of e-cigarette awareness combined with depiction of the devices as a favorable innovation may contribute to their wider adoption and may argue for regulation of e-cigarette advertising.

Citing Articles

Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Advertisement Trends After US Federal Policy Changes.

Shi R, Khayat A, Lee J, Garrison K, Jebai R, Wackowski O JAMA Netw Open. 2025; 8(2):e2459188.

PMID: 39937476 PMC: 11822544. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.59188.


The intention of college students to use electronic cigarettes: A study based on the theory of innovation diffusion.

Zou W, Wang X, Yang N, Ni X, Zhao Z, Meng R Tob Induc Dis. 2024; 22.

PMID: 38496253 PMC: 10941754. DOI: 10.18332/tid/185644.


Bridging: Accelerating Regulatory Acceptance of Reduced-Risk Tobacco and Nicotine Products.

Gaca M, Williamson J, Digard H, Adams L, Hawkridge L, Proctor C Nicotine Tob Res. 2022; 24(9):1371-1378.

PMID: 35171296 PMC: 9356683. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntac041.


PMI's heated tobacco products marketing claims of reduced risk and reduced exposure may entice youth to try and continue using these products.

McKelvey K, Baiocchi M, Halpern-Felsher B Tob Control. 2020; 29(e1):e18-e24.

PMID: 32029537 PMC: 7416542. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055318.


Adolescents' and Young Adults' Use and Perceptions of Pod-Based Electronic Cigarettes.

McKelvey K, Baiocchi M, Halpern-Felsher B JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 1(6):e183535.

PMID: 30646249 PMC: 6324423. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.3535.


References
1.
Trumbo C, Harper R . Use and perception of electronic cigarettes among college students. J Am Coll Health. 2014; 61(3):149-55. PMC: 4147677. DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2013.776052. View

2.
Pepper J, Emery S, Ribisl K, Brewer N . How U.S. adults find out about electronic cigarettes: implications for public health messages. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014; 16(8):1140-4. PMC: 4110926. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntu060. View

3.
Ayers J, Ribisl K, Brownstein J . Tracking the rise in popularity of electronic nicotine delivery systems (electronic cigarettes) using search query surveillance. Am J Prev Med. 2011; 40(4):448-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.12.007. View

4.
Huang J, Kornfield R, Szczypka G, Emery S . A cross-sectional examination of marketing of electronic cigarettes on Twitter. Tob Control. 2014; 23 Suppl 3:iii26-30. PMC: 4078681. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051551. View

5.
Cobb N, Brookover J, Cobb C . Forensic analysis of online marketing for electronic nicotine delivery systems. Tob Control. 2013; 24(2):128-31. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051185. View