» Articles » PMID: 25729357

The Effects of Intergroup Competition on Prosocial Behaviors in Young Children: a Comparison of 2.5-3.5 Year-olds with 5.5-6.5 Year-olds

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2015 Mar 3
PMID 25729357
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Group-based competition is considered to be a ubiquitous social context in human society. However, little is known about its potential effects on children's prosocial behaviors. To this end, we designed an experiment in which two age groups (2.5-3.5 years of age and 5.5-6.5 years of age) engaged in an intergroup competition task where they did a so-called "game" where each child transferred table tennis balls with a spoon from one container to the other. The non-intergroup competition condition was identical to the intergroup competition condition with one exception-no intergroup competition manipulation was involved. Then, they were required to perform two economic games used to measure their prosocial behaviors. We found that under the non-intergroup competition condition, as children aged, their behaviors tended to be more fairness-oriented (such as an increase in egalitarian behaviors). However, under the intergroup competition condition, children at 2.5-3.5 years of age tended to behave prosocially towards their ingroup members compared with those who are at 5.5-6.5 years of age. The behavioral pattern under the intergroup competition condition reflects strengthening prosocial tendencies driven by the intergroup competition in younger children and simultaneously weakening intergroup competition-driven prosocial tendencies possibly due to the development of fairness-oriented behaviors in older children. Taken together, these results point to the importance of considering the effects of competitive contexts on children's social behaviors and may have important implications for further research on the role of competitive contexts in the development of human prosocial behaviors.

Citing Articles

The Effect of Temporary Group Identity on Adolescent Social Mindfulness Decisions: An Empirical Study Using Team Sports Contexts.

Tao T, Guo W, Wang B Behav Sci (Basel). 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 39594299 PMC: 11591398. DOI: 10.3390/bs14110999.


Little evidence that androstadienone affects social distance-dependent prosocial behaviour: a pre-registered study.

Lu J, Ye Y, Wu Y R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11:240004.

PMID: 39076351 PMC: 11285484. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.240004.


Spillover effects of competition outcome on future risky cooperation.

Li Y, Liu Z, Wang Y, Derrington E, Moisan F, Dreher J Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):5535.

PMID: 37015992 PMC: 10073108. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-32523-6.


The influence of cooperation and competition on preschoolers' prosociality toward in-group and out-group members.

Toppe T, Hardecker S, Zerres F, Haun D R Soc Open Sci. 2021; 8(5):202171.

PMID: 34084543 PMC: 8150040. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.202171.


How does social competition affect true and false recognition?.

Liu Z, Liu T, Li Y Psychon Bull Rev. 2020; 28(1):292-303.

PMID: 32935280 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-020-01807-7.


References
1.
Sheskin M, Bloom P, Wynn K . Anti-equality: social comparison in young children. Cognition. 2013; 130(2):152-6. PMC: 3880565. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.10.008. View

2.
House B, Silk J, Henrich J, Clark Barrett H, Scelza B, Boyette A . Ontogeny of prosocial behavior across diverse societies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(36):14586-91. PMC: 3767518. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1221217110. View

3.
Ongley S, Nola M, Malti T . Children's giving: moral reasoning and moral emotions in the development of donation behaviors. Front Psychol. 2014; 5:458. PMC: 4033050. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00458. View

4.
Bowles S . Group competition, reproductive leveling, and the evolution of human altruism. Science. 2006; 314(5805):1569-72. DOI: 10.1126/science.1134829. View

5.
Buttelmann D, Bohm R . The ontogeny of the motivation that underlies in-group bias. Psychol Sci. 2014; 25(4):921-7. DOI: 10.1177/0956797613516802. View